Teams

CP-Laun SHOTS

2025 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Kimberly Skorupa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Laura Laun
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Results7 ties
2025-12-05Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMistie Iseman / Kimberly Skorupa vs Cynthia Garcia / Laurie Manley7-6, 6-3
2025-05-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllyson Marks / Kimberly Skorupa vs Stacey Iwata / Lorene Miller7-5, 6-1
2025-05-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnita Kamouri / Kimberly Skorupa vs Jennifer Vanderhyden / Terri Bourne3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesKimberly Skorupa / Genevieve Warren vs Kitty Flaherty / Heidi Martin6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-05-09Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLaura Laun / Judy Greenstein vs Kieran Oaksmith / Melanie Kosloff6-3, 6-4
2025-03-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Skorupa / Merrie Vieco vs Danxia Chen / Emiko Way2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesMerrie Vieco / Kimberly Skorupa vs Darlette Knight / Maggie Miller6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kimberly Skorupa
132W–138L career
21%80%0%
3.54
4
Laura Laun
28W–30L career
55%45%0%
3.42

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.