Teams

Shipley 55+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over Day · Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-18vs MacAttack 7.0 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPatricia Murphy / Elizabeth Goldy vs Esther Wang / Joanne Stine2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-07-31vs Grube 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Patricia Murphy vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Nancy Trimble1-6, 1-6
2022-07-25vs Make Some Sparks 55+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen D'Agrosa / Terri Bradford vs Janet Miller / Marge Naviasky2-6, 1-6
2022-07-13vs Double Trouble 55+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Goldy / Patricia Murphy vs Kathryn Poehler / Rosemary Prola4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesColleen D'Agrosa / Denise Berger vs Kim Nowalk / Leslie Kendrick1-6, 1-6
2022-07-07vs MacAttack 7.0 55+Split 11
L#1 DoublesPatricia Murphy / Elizabeth Goldy vs Claire Rossmark / Esther Wang1-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Barall / Colleen D'Agrosa vs Chandra Stokes / Debra MacDonald7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-25vs Grube 55+Split 11
W#1 DoublesDenise Berger / Elizabeth Goldy vs Missy Burke / Bonnie Bernard2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bradford / Kelly Murray vs Nancy Knouse / Helen Wohnsigl1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Elizabeth Goldy
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.17
Darcie Hammer
published 3.5
3.08
Pam Franks
published
2.78
Terri Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Colleen D'Agrosa
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Patricia Murphy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen D'Agrosa + Terri Bradford1727% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Goldy
125W–115L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Darcie Hammer
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Pam Franks
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Terri Bradford
24W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Colleen D'Agrosa
93W–116L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.69
Patricia Murphy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.