Teams

PTC PINK

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-30vs CHCC BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesShannon Kleinbach / Tracy Pursell vs Ann Marie Johnson / Dananne Solomon4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesErika Shorter vs Kelsey Cullen2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Christina Good vs Vanessa Ramich / Stacey Knox2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Marcela Lopez vs Cindy Wells / Brooke O'Donnell2-6, 1-6
2024-05-23vs CACM TEALWon 21
W#1 DoublesErika Shorter / Su Mei Chen vs Lynn Kitt / Tiffany Sandusky4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheryl Sanders / Amy Mohr vs Sarah Kopp / Michelle Odenbach6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Marcela Lopez vs Amanda Sheehan / Brandis Becky6-4, 7-5
2024-05-16vs SKY TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesChris Thulin / Cheryl Sanders vs Laura Agelopoulos / Kim Brummond6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesShannon Kleinbach vs Suzi Janzen6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSu Mei Chen / Tracy Pursell vs Katelin Ramer / Jennifer Lester7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Marcela Lopez vs Jennifer Parnell / Katie Garrison2-6, 1-6
2024-05-09vs EM REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesShannon Kleinbach / Erika Shorter vs Jll McLain / Jean Steimel7-6, 7-6
W#1 SinglesChris Thulin vs Kate Bangs0-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristina Good / Cheryl Sanders vs Melissa Zink / Colley Moe2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcela Lopez / Caren Swan vs Brilynn Cahill / Kathryn Terry0-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-05vs GCC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesPatti Coker / Tracy Pursell vs Allison Kaelberer / Karen Raftery6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesErika Shorter / Su Mei Chen vs Emer Dempsey / Andrea Howland - Cobb3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChris Thulin / Cheryl Sanders vs Sarah Dennis / Rima Hea4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-02vs ATC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesShannon Kleinbach / Erika Shorter vs Riisa Dikeou / Megan Lynch6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatti Coker / Tracy Pursell vs Jackie Brown-Griggs / Tami Beardsley6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChris Thulin / Amy Mohr vs Kristy Sands / Laurie MacDowell6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-25vs CACM REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesErika Shorter / Tracy Pursell vs Lauren Flynn / Tandy Dilworth7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Mohr / Chris Thulin vs Bobbie Turner / Blair OConnor6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCaren Swan / Su Mei Chen vs Becky Reimers / Lise Uhrich6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Amy Mohr
published 3.5
3.35
Chris Thulin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.31
Su Mei Chen
published
3.29
Erika Shorter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.26
Shannon Kleinbach
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Jena Smith
published
3.20
Christina Good
published 3.5
3.12
Cheryl Sanders
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Tracy Pursell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Marcela Lopez
published
2.96
Caren Swan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Restivo
published
Patti Coker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Su Mei Chen + Jena Smith4167% games+12.7% vs expected
Erika Shorter + Shannon Kleinbach22459% games+4.1% vs expected
Tracy Pursell + Su Mei Chen5351% games+2.5% vs expected
Erika Shorter + Su Mei Chen5250% games+2.4% vs expected
Chris Thulin + Cheryl Sanders111251% games+0.9% vs expected
Shannon Kleinbach + Su Mei Chen3353% games−3.1% vs expected
Tracy Pursell + Erika Shorter1438% gamesnot enough data
Tracy Pursell + Shannon Kleinbach224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Mohr
18W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Chris Thulin
103W–64L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
Su Mei Chen
28W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Erika Shorter
76W–46L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Shannon Kleinbach
70W–41L career · 4 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Jena Smith
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Christina Good
6W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
3.20
3.5
Cheryl Sanders
133W–123L career · 5 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Tracy Pursell
92W–79L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Marcela Lopez
4W–20L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Caren Swan
146W–83L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
2.96
Elizabeth Restivo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Coker
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.