Teams

LAMichalskiLNRC

2026 Lake USTA 65 & Over League · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-20vs LCLO-Long/jettonLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarole Catlett / Victoria Taylor vs Cindy Long / Mindy Francis6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKayes Mary Lynn / Gloria Barnes vs Tracy Podesta / Louise Brown6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAlice White / June Larson vs Janice Ingram / Donna Strauss1-6, 1-6
2026-04-13vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 3.5 Mon 65+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Michalski / June Larson vs Julia Mueller / Norma Zitnik4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKathryn Marazzi / Victoria Taylor vs Kathy Murphy / Margaret Dittemore6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesConnie Maggio / Hilda Dietrich vs Arlene Ireland / Brenda Jandebeur1-6, 5-7
2026-04-12vs LCLO-Long/jettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Michalski / Kayes Mary Lynn vs Karime Jankauskas / Suzun McCrary2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKaren Walters / June Larson vs Jan Wildman / Susan Bumgarner6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFaye Childress / Mara Allen vs Janice Ingram / Janet Harmon0-6, 2-6
2026-03-30vs LCLO-Long/jettonLost 12
W#1 DoublesCarole Catlett / Victoria Taylor vs Cindy Long / Alexandra Smith2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMara Allen / Karen Walters vs Martha Venter / Janice Ingram1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHilda Dietrich / Alice White vs Julie Nance / Louise Brown0-6, 1-6
2026-03-29vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 3.5 Mon 65+Won 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Neal / Kathryn Marazzi vs Joanne Cunningham / Nina Archer6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Michalski / Gloria Barnes vs Arlene Ireland / Kathy Murphy6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFaye Childress / Connie Maggio vs Wendy Goodwin / Brenda Jandebeur6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-23vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 3.5 Mon 65+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Michalski / Gloria Barnes vs Kari Comadoll / Norma Zitnik2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Neal / Kayes Mary Lynn vs Allison Ogden / Nina Archer3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFaye Childress / Connie Maggio vs Brenda Jandebeur / Wendy Goodwin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-20vs LCLO-Long/jettonLost 03
L#1 DoublesVictoria Taylor / Linda Neal vs Kathleen Rissberger / Karime Jankauskas0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Michalski / Kayes Mary Lynn vs Mindy Francis / Cindy Long1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFaye Childress / Mara Allen vs Janet Harmon / Martha Venter0-6, 2-6
2026-03-02vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 3.5 Mon 65+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Walters / Linda Neal vs Allison Ogden / Kari Comadoll3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Michalski / Victoria Taylor vs Brenda Jandebeur / Julia Mueller4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesConnie Maggio / Kathryn Marazzi vs Nina Archer / Ursula Kleimeier3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carole Catlett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Gloria Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Karen Walters
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.05
Kathryn Marazzi
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
June Larson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Amy Michalski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Faye Childress
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Linda Neal
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.97
Victoria Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.90
Alice White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.89
Kayes Mary Lynn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Hilda Dietrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Connie Maggio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Mara Allen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carole Catlett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Gloria Barnes
2W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
28%71%<1%
3.07
Karen Walters
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
Kathryn Marazzi
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
June Larson
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Amy Michalski
2W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
3.5
Faye Childress
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Linda Neal
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Victoria Taylor
3W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.97
3.5
Alice White
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Kayes Mary Lynn
28W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Hilda Dietrich
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Connie Maggio
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Mara Allen
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.