Teams

Winkler

2026 Adult 18 & Over-EC · Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.71 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-04vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAva Fratesi / Sarah Wooten vs Elizabeth Jones / Jenna Hladik3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHiroko Clay / Alison Buehler vs Jean Hurst / Patti Stanley6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Scott Lee / Adriana Sumner vs Jordyn Gill / Renee Phillips1-6, 2-6
2026-04-27vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAdriana Sumner / Christa Winkler vs Jean Hurst / Patti Stanley0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Wooten vs Candice Maze0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Buehler / Mim Boyette vs Chaney Fair / Jordyn Gill2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAva Fratesi / Anna Scott Lee vs Allyson Jones / Skyler Stapp5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-21vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDelaney Wallace / Hiroko Clay vs Jean Hurst / Lyndsey Godwin5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Davis / Anna Scott Lee vs Cathryn Borer / Margo Allgood2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChrista Winkler / Alison Buehler vs MARY GALJOUR / Elizabeth Jones1-6, 1-6
2026-04-20vs Maze 18+ 3.0Split 22
W#1 DoublesChrista Winkler / Sarah Wooten vs Jenna Hladik / Chaney Fair6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHiroko Clay vs Candice Maze4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnna Scott Lee / Mary Martin vs Allyson Jones / Kathryn Phillips5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlison Buehler / Adriana Sumner vs GAYLA RYE / Skyler Stapp3-6, 0-6
2026-04-13vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMary Martin / Sarah Wooten vs Renee Phillips / Candice Maze1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesHiroko Clay / Christa Winkler vs Cathryn Borer / GAYLA RYE1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesAlison Buehler / Anna Scott Lee vs Jean Hurst / Patti Stanley0-6, 0-6
2026-03-31vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesHiroko Clay / Delaney Wallace vs Jean Hurst / Patti Stanley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAdriana Sumner / Yunsun Park vs Allyson Jones / Jenna Hladik0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChrista Winkler / Mim Boyette vs Candice Maze / Lyndsey Godwin2-6, 0-6
2026-03-02vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAdriana Sumner / Sarah Wooten vs Chaney Fair / Renee Phillips1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesYunsun Park vs Jenna Hladik1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChrista Winkler / Ava Fratesi vs Margo Allgood / Elizabeth Jones7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAnna Scott Lee / Mary Martin vs Kathryn Phillips / Jordyn Gill3-6, 3-6
2026-02-17vs Maze 18+ 3.0Lost 13
L#1 DoublesLauren Davis / Mim Boyette vs Patti Stanley / Jean Hurst0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChrista Winkler vs Cathryn Borer3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDelaney Wallace / Sarah Wooten vs MARY GALJOUR / Chaney Fair6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAva Fratesi / Adriana Sumner vs GAYLA RYE / Allyson Jones6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Maze 18+ 3.08025715176
2Winkler0872554358

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Ava Fratesi
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Delaney Wallace
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Wooten
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.48
Hiroko Clay
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.47
Christa Winkler
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.29
Alison Buehler
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.19
Anna Scott Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.18
Mim Boyette
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Adriana Sumner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Yunsun Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alison Buehler + Christa Winkler134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ava Fratesi
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Delaney Wallace
17W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
2.82
Sarah Wooten
12W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
2.5
Hiroko Clay
4W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%58%42%
2.48
3
Christa Winkler
8W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Alison Buehler
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Anna Scott Lee
2W–4L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Mim Boyette
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.18
2.5
Adriana Sumner
5W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Yunsun Park
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.