Teams

Celtnieks

2023 18&Over Men Manhattan · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / METROPOLITAN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-11vs Metro: Okumura/LekserLost 04
L#1 DoublesIldar Istarki / Mark Eric Rodriguez vs William Packer / Erli Perez3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Celtnieks vs Hasnain Khan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKenil Tanna / Timothy Wojcik vs Eric Ip / Ernest Mai5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTomer Peer / Edward Hong vs Benjamin A Vassallo / Ricarte Abejuela0-6, 0-6
2023-06-07vs RappaccioliWon 40
W#1 DoublesVladimir Parizhsky / JUSTIN RIFIS vs Andre Rappaccioli / MICHAEL FITZGERALD6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoseph Celtnieks vs Landon Smith6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDave Lee / David Silberberg vs Jade Almendrala / Rafael Sahagun6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTimothy Wojcik vs Charlie Dreyfus4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-01vs ReichWon 31
L#1 DoublesIldar Istarki / Edward Hong vs Jose Troconis Zurita / Chris Flood1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJUSTIN RIFIS vs Jason Lenderink6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJoseph Celtnieks vs Andrew Ng4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKenil Tanna / Tomer Peer vs Joseph Lam / Harry Figgie6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-22vs Tam/QuachLost 13
W#1 DoublesIldar Istarki / Daniel Ruiz vs Nick Teo / Genie Mu7-6, 5-5
L#1 SinglesJUSTIN RIFIS vs Sean Philip2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesVladimir Parizhsky / Joseph Celtnieks vs John Tam / Michael Wong4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKenil Tanna / David Silberberg vs Leo Zhang / Kevin Quach3-6, 1-6
2023-05-15vs DervinWon 21
L#1 DoublesEdward Hong / Joseph Celtnieks vs Jordon Jew / TK Kong2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Pincus / Justin Farber vs Peter Krawczyk / David Anderson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTimothy Wojcik / Daniel Ruiz vs Michael Dervin / John Hall6-0, 6-2
2023-05-07vs Metro: Okumura/LekserLost 04
L#1 DoublesMartin Concepcion / Ildar Istarki vs Terry Wang / Zedd Tu3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTomer Peer / Adam Pincus vs Nelson Deuz / Ricarte Abejuela2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesEdward Hong vs Nelson Arvin Dorado1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDavid Silberberg / Dave Lee vs Scott McHugh / Brendan Boyle0-6, 1-6
2023-04-30vs RappaccioliWon 31
W#1 DoublesJoseph Celtnieks / Martin Concepcion vs Landon Smith / Yaoqi Guo6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAdam Pincus / Vladimir Parizhsky vs Vasco Ivanov / Jeffrey Dietz7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJUSTIN RIFIS vs Andre Rappaccioli6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTomer Peer / Giles Shai vs Sam Siegel / Graham Helgans1-6, 0-6
2023-04-27vs ReichWon 30
W#1 DoublesMartin Concepcion / Ildar Istarki vs Vikram D'Mello / Jose Troconis Zurita1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMark Eric Rodriguez / Edward Hong vs JP Hormillosa / Joseph Lam7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGiles Shai / Vladimir Parizhsky vs Matt Blakeman / Bruno Scarselli2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-04-21vs Tam/QuachLost 13
W#1 DoublesJoseph Celtnieks / Mark Eric Rodriguez vs Connor Svrcek / Andrew Wu6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesIldar Istarki vs Sean Philip6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTomer Peer / Giles Shai vs John Tam / Michael Wong3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDave Lee / David Silberberg vs Leo Zhang / Richard Wolffe2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.60 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Adam Pincus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Silberberg
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Edward Hong
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Ildar Istarki
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
JUSTIN RIFIS
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Joseph Celtnieks
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Martin Concepcion
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Timothy Wojcik
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tomer Peer
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Vladimir Parizhsky
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Martin Concepcion + Ildar Istarki314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Adam Pincus
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
David Silberberg
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Edward Hong
16W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
2.60
Ildar Istarki
10W–10L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
JUSTIN RIFIS
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Joseph Celtnieks
14W–21L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Martin Concepcion
17W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Timothy Wojcik
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tomer Peer
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Vladimir Parizhsky
14W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.