Teams

EW-WRAC-Bowen-Lorrain

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 WOMEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-23vs PC-Peach PreservesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoann Richardson / Lisa Watkins vs Candee Foss / Deborah Spore6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Jeannie Friehauf / Tammy Deery6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesCindy Bowen-Lorrain / Selena Hernandez vs Nancy Lauck / Deborah Wall4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-10-23vs WCCP-Boinski/DahmWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeata Miller / Lisa Watkins vs Stephanie Butler / Teri Alexander6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Susan Boinski / Terri Dahm6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCindy Bowen-Lorrain / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Jan Hardenbrook / Cheryl Stransky3-6, 2-6
2022-10-22vs CBRC-AllenWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Mary Lee Pickett / Judi Harris6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBeata Miller / Lisa Watkins vs Lory Allen / Kathy Queen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSelena Hernandez / Kathy Dinwiddie vs Diane Molleson / Anne Sampson6-2, 7-6
2022-10-22vs EW-WCCP-SteinerLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoann Richardson / Kathy Dinwiddie vs MaryLynn Dodd / Shirlee Steiner4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen McIver / Joyce Flyckt vs Nancy Bettesworth / Marie Lambert6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBeata Miller / Lisa Watkins vs Sandee Andrews / Voni Tombari1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Lisa Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Beata Miller
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.61
Cindy Bowen-Lorrain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Kathleen McIver
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.51
Joyce Flyckt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kathy Dinwiddie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Selena Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Watkins + Beata Miller61045% games−17.5% vs expected
Kathleen McIver + Joyce Flyckt7355% gamesnot enough data
Selena Hernandez + Cindy Bowen-Lorrain3256% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Kathy Dinwiddie224 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Beata Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen McIver + Cindy Bowen-Lorrain033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Watkins
73W–79L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.51
3
Beata Miller
66W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
2.64
3
Cindy Bowen-Lorrain
20W–50L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kathleen McIver
56W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
Joyce Flyckt
23W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
Kathy Dinwiddie
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Selena Hernandez
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.