Teams

Suhor/18/4.0/M/BREC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.0 BR (18&O) Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-16vs Martin/18/4.0/M/LSULost 23
L#1 DoublesDaniel Adler / Parker Delatte vs Sangho Yu / Martin Padial6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesStephen Swiber vs Thach Nguyen4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesJon Eenigenburg / Bradley Allen vs Tyler Martin / Stephen Bienvenu7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAndrew Rabalais vs Justin Goings2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesTimothy Kwan / Kelly Lee vs Jeff Martin / Ben Terral6-2, 6-1
2025-03-12vs Martin/18/4.0/M/LSUWon 32
L#1 DoublesTimothy Kwan / Jon Eenigenburg vs Tyler Martin / Michael Evetts2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesStephen Swiber vs Sangho Yu3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesParker Delatte / Daniel Adler vs Nathan Nguyen / Stephen Bienvenu7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAndrew Rabalais vs Thach Nguyen7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMatthew Breaux / Bradley Allen vs Hunter Kinchen / Ben Terral2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 BR (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Jon Eenigenburg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.89
Dan Gardiner
published 4
3.79
Parker Delatte
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Teche Melancon
published
3.78
Andrew Rabalais
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
Daniel Adler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Stephen Swiber
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.61
Mark Christopher
published
3.58
Matthew Breaux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Lawson Clegg
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Michael Degeyter
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Scott Wilkes
published
Timothy Kwan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Adler + Parker Delatte123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jon Eenigenburg
18W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
4
Dan Gardiner
21W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Parker Delatte
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Teche Melancon
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Andrew Rabalais
17W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Daniel Adler
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Swiber
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Mark Christopher
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Matthew Breaux
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Lawson Clegg
47W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Michael Degeyter
12W–2L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Wilkes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Timothy Kwan
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.