Teams

CR-BP RED

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-20vs ATC GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesJD Ready / William Epping vs Daniel Washburne / Zachary Davis6-4, 6-1
2023-07-13vs SS-H REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Epping / David Hand vs Scott Sagel / Nathan Couch7-6, 6-2
2023-07-06vs HRCA-N BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesJD Ready / Adam Burbary vs Robert Schock / Tim Taylor4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-29vs LTFC BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesTomo Watanabe / William Epping vs Sean Page / Andrew Folkerth6-3, 6-0
2023-06-15vs HRCA-S GREENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJD Ready / Adam Burbary vs Brian Swift / Thomas Larsen6-3, 6-1
2023-06-08vs SS-H BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesGustavo Belloso / JD Ready vs Matthew Bruff / Josh Dougan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAdam Burbary / Zac Storatz vs Benjamin Walker / Ben Atlee6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jason Bisanti
published 4.5
4.35
Tomo Watanabe
published
4.31
Michael Olds
published
4.29
David Hand
published 4.5
4.24
JD Ready
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Nick Taylor
published
4.11
William Epping
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.10
Ryan James
published
4.10
Adam Burbary
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.08
Gustavo Belloso
published
3.92
Zac Storatz
published
3.86
Paul Jaszewski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adam Burbary + JD Ready181453% games−4.6% vs expected
Zac Storatz + Gustavo Belloso224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jason Bisanti
35W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
4.38
Tomo Watanabe
20W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%14%
4.35
Michael Olds
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
David Hand
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
4.29
4.5
JD Ready
119W–116L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
Nick Taylor
7W–15L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
William Epping
34W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
Ryan James
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Adam Burbary
52W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.10
Gustavo Belloso
7W–26L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.08
Zac Storatz
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
71%29%<1%
3.92
Paul Jaszewski
33W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.