Teams

BLACKHAWK CC 18AM4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-17vs PLEASANTON 18AM4.0DLost 01
L#2 DoublesAndrew Johnson / Nathan Duda vs Ashish Bhardwaj / Tapan Sharma3-6, 2-6
2023-06-11vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#3 DoublesAshok Ganesan / Andrew Johnson vs Gowri Akku / Deepak Jain1-6, 1-6
2023-05-31vs FREMONT TC 18AM4.0CLost 01
L#2 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Craig Verzosa3-6, 3-6
2023-05-23vs PLEASANTON 18AM4.0DWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Theriault / Andrew Johnson vs Ravi Kiran Reddy Madireddy / Rohit Chhabra6-4, 6-2
2023-05-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Greer / Andrew Johnson vs Matthew Do / Rajesh Sivakumar7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2023-05-10Won 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Angus Chin6-1, 6-2
2023-04-30vs MISSION HILLS 18AM4.0ALost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Jerome Pons3-6, 3-6
2023-04-23vs Bay Club Fremont 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 SinglesAndrew Johnson vs Brant McCall4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-16vs STONEBRAE 18AM4.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Greer / Andrew Johnson vs Derrick Guzman / Robert Leong6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
John Sines
published
3.61
Ganesh Nair
published
3.53
Ashok Ganesan
published 3.5
3.52
3.52
Joseph Kardek
published
3.52
Thomas Lee
published
3.52
Robert Greer
published
3.38
Henry Liu
published
3.32
Scott Takishita
published
3.27
David Hsieh
published 3.5
Andrew Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 24%, also #2 Singles 24% · published 3.5
Surinder Yadav
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashok Ganesan + Henry Liu3257% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Sines
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62
Ganesh Nair
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Ashok Ganesan
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.53
Sridhar Balasubramanian
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.52
Thomas Lee
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Robert Greer
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
Henry Liu
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
Scott Takishita
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
David Hsieh
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Andrew Johnson
76W–32L career · 15 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Surinder Yadav
26W–31L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.