Teams

D.Farmer2-3.0

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-06vs G.Fye 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJosh Dellinger / Donzell Newkirk vs Jason Hagens / Gregory Knowles1-6, 0-6
2023-04-29vs J.HastingsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJosh Dellinger / Patrick Vickers vs Travis Salts / Kyle Truman3-6, 2-6
2023-04-15Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn van Ness / Josh Dellinger vs Michael Walters / Thomas Sewitsky3-6, 4-6
2023-04-08vs J.Hoomani 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPatrick Vickers / Josh Dellinger vs Scott Walton / Nevin Shrimanker4-6, 3-6
2023-03-25vs R.ADAMSLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Vickers / Aaron Archie-Moody vs Robb Adams / Gary McAuliffe1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJosh Dellinger / Donzell Newkirk vs Edwin Cadet / Andrew Perry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-03-18vs D.Sielaty 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesPatrick Vickers / Josh Dellinger vs Rico Burr / Ed Scott2-6, 2-6
2023-03-16Split 11
L#2 DoublesJosh Dellinger / Brandon van Buren vs Bryan Kohan / Colin Savage7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesPatrick Vickers / Aaron Emmanuel-Overton vs Roman Saprykin / Marc Dobos3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAaron Archie-Moody / Patrick Vickers vs William Hesmer / Paul Warren1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dempsey Farmer
published 4.5
3.08
Josh Dellinger
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.95
Patrick Vickers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Carl Anthony
published 3
2.75
John van Ness
published
2.72
Donzell Newkirk
published 3
2.61
Lawrence Pollard
published
2.61
Michael Benecky
published
2.33
Gary Carlson
published 2.5
Patrick Faulkner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patrick Vickers + Josh Dellinger92142% games−10.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dempsey Farmer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Josh Dellinger
77W–70L career · 13 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.08
3
Patrick Vickers
62W–85L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
3
Brandon van Buren
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Carl Anthony
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John van Ness
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Donzell Newkirk
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Lawrence Pollard
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
Michael Benecky
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.61
2.5
Gary Carlson
3W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.33
Patrick Faulkner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.