Teams

Martin-Rauth/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.0 women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-13vs Miller-Hardin/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristi Johnson / Mary Neely vs Anne Stone / Jana Lind6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDebra Masdea / Kay Henderson vs Eileen Long / Dominique Muhlada3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeAnn Rauth / Theresa Jones vs Vernice White / Sue Munson7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-06vs Miller-Hardin/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLeanne Morrow / Karen Petty vs Jana Lind / Carole Miller3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDebra Masdea / Kay Henderson vs Eileen Long / Mary Miller6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDeAnn Rauth / Kari Martin vs Paula Reagan / Sue Munson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs Miller-Hardin/ChattanoogaWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Neely / Kristi Johnson vs Ann Carroll / Carole Miller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Petty / Jana Watters vs Diane Hardin / Vernice White2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Miller-Hardin/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeAnn Rauth / Lanette Young vs Paula Reagan / Vernice White6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTheresa Jones / Kay Henderson vs Bernadette Dorris / Anne Stone2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Neely / Jana Watters vs Diane Hardin / Mary Miller5-7, 5-7
2025-03-15vs Miller-Hardin/ChattanoogaLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristi Johnson / Karen Petty vs Diane Hardin / Dominique Muhlada7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKay Henderson / Jana Watters vs Bernadette Dorris / Anne Stone3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Mary Neely
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Kay Henderson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Lanette Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Debra Masdea
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
DeAnn Rauth
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Leanne Morrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Karen Petty
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Jana Watters
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Neely
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kay Henderson
31W–34L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Lanette Young
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Debra Masdea
2W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
DeAnn Rauth
7W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Leanne Morrow
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Karen Petty
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Jana Watters
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.