Teams

HOA/Crampton/65&over8.0W

2026 HOA Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 · 8.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 8.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Crampton/65&over8.0W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Diane Werner
published 4.5
3.81
Anne Hope
published 4
Chris Livingston
published 4
3.72
3.69
Nancy Wedel
published
3.62
Meg Townsend
published
3.55
Lyla Flohrs
published
3.44
Becky Mehrmann
published 4
3.40
Lori Breshears
published
3.22
Marcia Jacelone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ann Crampton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Marsha Taylor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Hope + Nancy Wedel15075% games+11.6% vs expected
Marsha Taylor + Meg Townsend7067% games+6.0% vs expected
Lyla Flohrs + Meg Townsend4259% games+1.0% vs expected
Marsha Taylor + Becky Mehrmann2348% gamesnot enough data
Becky Mehrmann + Lyla Flohrs3248% gamesnot enough data
Lyla Flohrs + Ann Crampton5067% gamesnot enough data
Lori Breshears + Meg Townsend314 matchesnot enough data
Marsha Taylor + Lyla Flohrs314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane Werner
66W–66L career · no lines in 2026
86%14%<1%
3.85
4
Anne Hope
112W–53L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Chris Livingston
4W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Janice Redlingshafer
47W–36L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.72
Nancy Wedel
128W–51L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Meg Townsend
129W–51L career · no lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
3.62
Lyla Flohrs
68W–31L career · no lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Becky Mehrmann
82W–65L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.44
Lori Breshears
91W–83L career · no lines in 2026
76%24%<1%
3.40
Marcia Jacelone
49W–46L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Marsha Taylor
43W–25L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.