Teams

Lacy/Memphis

2022 Combo 18 & Over - Memphis · 5.5 18 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-24vs TerBurgh/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Taylor / Ping Zhou vs Alyssa Higgins / Elizabeth Darby6-1, 6-0
2022-08-29vs Wilson/MemphisWon 10
W#2 DoublesPing Zhou / Natalie Taylor vs Faith Ruch / Rebekah Kingsley6-2, 6-4
2022-08-20vs Nair/MemphisWon 10
W#1 DoublesNatalie Taylor / Jamie White vs Renee DeGutis / Becky Brady6-1, 7-5
2022-08-13vs Gilless/MemphisLost 01
L#1 DoublesGina Cox / Natalie Taylor vs Tonia Gardner / Carey Pontius4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Natalie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.41
Bradi Bair
published 3.5
3.36
Lacey Moody
published
3.12
Carla Higgins
published 3
3.11
Taylor Wetta
published
3.04
Ping Zhou
published
2.94
Katherine Lanfranco
published
2.82
Susan Northen-Lacy
published
2.79
Lisa Monahan
published
Angela Burkes
published 3
2.60
Marjorie Noldon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katherine Lanfranco + Lacey Moody2350% games+8.2% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Bradi Bair15658% games+0.4% vs expected
Susan Northen-Lacy + Ping Zhou2448% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Taylor
39W–28L career · 4 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Bradi Bair
67W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Lacey Moody
38W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3
Carla Higgins
58W–35L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.12
Taylor Wetta
21W–21L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Ping Zhou
36W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.04
Katherine Lanfranco
20W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Susan Northen-Lacy
49W–54L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
Lisa Monahan
27W–43L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Angela Burkes
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Marjorie Noldon
5W–12L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.