Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Bayna

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.0W PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-05vs Sports Mall-Peterson/SummerhaysWon 21
W#1 DoublesCari Johnson / Rebecca Harman vs Lisa Packer / Shawna Smart6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Pappas / Natasha Plyer vs Lindsey Pizza / Heather George6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Higbee / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Emily Matheson / Kami Galbraith6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-29Won 10
W#3 DoublesStacy Higbee / Kalaiselvi Seetharaman vs Davinia Lyon / Melanie Decker0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-07-22vs Wasatch Hills-BerceauWon 20
W#2 DoublesKristen Logan / Jamie Sorensen vs Kassie Belcher / Katie Murphy6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Higbee / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Linda Lasater / Brooke Iverson6-1, 6-3
2024-07-15vs Sunpro-Gouff/MurrayWon 10
W#3 DoublesKalaiselvi Seetharaman / Stacy Higbee vs Rebecca Waite / Jen White6-3, 6-1
2024-07-08vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreLost 01
L#1 DoublesCari Johnson / Lisa Pappas vs Emma Li / Bernadette Muniz6-7, 2-6
2024-06-24vs Sports Mall-Peterson/SummerhaysWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Pappas / Rebecca Harman vs Paula Naatz / Carlie Diviney1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesStacy Higbee / Lisa Pappas vs Betsy Ostrander / Nicole Leatham2-6, 2-6
2024-06-10vs Wasatch Hills-BerceauWon 20
W#2 DoublesJamie Sorensen / Kristen Logan vs Shelly Kaihatu / Jane Krysinski6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNatasha Plyer / Lisa Pappas vs Jennifer Sorensen / Wendy Hopkins6-3, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Jamie Sorensen
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.91
Jennifer Wily
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published
2.84
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Natasha Plyer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Marti Skjervem
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.73
Cari Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.61
Lisa Pappas
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.53
Stacy Higbee
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kristen Logan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nooshin Prasthofer
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
Susan Gardner Folau
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Wily + Delia Bayna14554% games+0.7% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Delia Bayna2738% games+0.3% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Lisa Pappas2348% games+0.3% vs expected
Jamie Sorensen + Delia Bayna2351% games+0.3% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Rebecca Harman4357% games−0.6% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Lisa Pappas5259% games−1.5% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + KayeLynn BASTIAN192450% games−3.1% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Kalaiselvi Seetharaman5353% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jamie Sorensen
78W–102L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Jennifer Wily
120W–177L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
2.91
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · 22 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
Kalaiselvi Seetharaman
82W–91L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Natasha Plyer
22W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Marti Skjervem
62W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 11 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 14 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lisa Pappas
30W–30L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
Stacy Higbee
17W–21L career · 5 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Kristen Logan
25W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
97W–124L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Gardner Folau
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.