Teams

SB-LLW-Play It Forward-Tiffany Foster

2023 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 4.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.08 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-11-12vs Pershing-UnstrungSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMillie Tadewaldt / Daisy Carlson vs Amy Sagraves / Beth Ford5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKaren Suzuki / Medeighnia Westwick vs Yang Ja Ballard / Sally Jordan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2023-11-05vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Suzuki / Jessica Scott vs Becky Cantrell / Emily Carver6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Millie Tadewaldt vs Julie Rosenthal / Tina Yang6-0, 6-2
2023-10-29vs Pershing-UnstrungSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMillie Tadewaldt / Daisy Carlson vs Amy Sagraves / Shannon Minne1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMedeighnia Westwick / Robin Nielsen vs Beth Ford / Yang Ja Ballard6-1, 6-1
2023-10-22vs Elings-English MuffinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMillie Tadewaldt / Daisy Carlson vs Rosemary Talmadge / Deborah Carlen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-10-15vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 20
W#2 DoublesKaren Suzuki / Millie Tadewaldt vs Jenny Kearns / Naomi Eskenazi6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCarrie Randolph / Daisy Carlson vs Debbie Rhodes / Jeppe Madsen6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-01vs Elings-English MuffinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Garrison / Karen Suzuki vs Jill Sagner / Bina Ahmed6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Cynthia Frohling vs Kristen Kovacs / Alicia Linquiti6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-09-24vs SBTC-Volley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Nielsen / Karen Suzuki vs Kristen Battles / Nina Leonard6-4, 6-2
2023-09-17vs Pershing-UnstrungWon 10
W#1 DoublesKersten Barr / Cynthia Frohling vs Sally Jordan / Beverly Aronson6-2, 6-3
2023-09-10vs Elings-English MuffinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKersten Barr / Cynthia Frohling vs Bina Ahmed / Alicia Linquiti6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDaisy Carlson / Nancy Garrison vs Kristen Kovacs / Stacey Gannon4-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Kersten Barr
published
4.20
Tiffany Foster
published
4.09
Jessica Scott
published
4.09
Karen Suzuki
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.00
Medeighnia Westwick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.96
Millie Tadewaldt
published
3.85
Daisy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.80
Nancy Garrison
published
3.73
Jill Crang
published
3.63
Christina Stoney
published 4
3.62
Carrie Randolph
published 4
3.62
Caron Berryhill
published 4
3.60
Cynthia Frohling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jennifer Kinsella
published
Kristin Mcwilliams
published
Rachael Stein
published
Robin Nielsen
published
Susan McMillan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Randolph + Christina Stoney7358% games+5.6% vs expected
Daisy Carlson + Millie Tadewaldt4159% games+0.7% vs expected
Rachael Stein + Kristin Mcwilliams1531% games−8.7% vs expected
Daisy Carlson + Kersten Barr5068% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Garrison + Daisy Carlson404 matchesnot enough data
Medeighnia Westwick + Tiffany Foster314 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Garrison + Christina Stoney123 matchesnot enough data
Medeighnia Westwick + Karen Suzuki213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kersten Barr
29W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
4.33
Tiffany Foster
23W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Jessica Scott
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Karen Suzuki
86W–68L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Medeighnia Westwick
30W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
4.00
Millie Tadewaldt
35W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Daisy Carlson
186W–93L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.85
Nancy Garrison
31W–17L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
Jill Crang
16W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christina Stoney
23W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Randolph
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Caron Berryhill
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Cynthia Frohling
63W–56L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
Jennifer Kinsella
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Mcwilliams
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachael Stein
4W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Nielsen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan McMillan
17W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.