Teams

Lockard/18/2.5/CWN/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 Shrev

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-26vs Pettis-Nelson/18/2.5/CWN/SHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlicia Thomisee / Paige Ferrant vs Courtney Padgett / Hannah Lamb6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTarah Lockard / Kay Patterson vs Grace Chandler / KATHERINE SALVAIL2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha Lowe / Julie McEachern vs Grace Anne Rogers / Caitlyn Mathias6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-19vs Golden/18/2.5/CWN/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesLisa Kellogg / Kaytlyn Remedes vs Olivia Alexander / Lacey Tipton6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSarah Mccurley / Alicia Thomisee vs Lindsey Golden / Lauren Ocmand6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Stanley / Leah Feldt vs Kellie Harper / Twilla Robinsoin6-1, 6-2
2026-08-12vs Tipton/18/2.5/CWN/QTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartha Silva / Samantha Lowe vs Elizabeth Tipton / Madison Edwards6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTarah Lockard / Paige Ferrant vs Onesty Culpepper / Kathryn Frey6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie McEachern / Kay Patterson vs Dion Stripland / Heather Prator4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.52
Lisa Kellogg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.40
Paige Ferrant
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.38
Martha Silva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.14
Julie McEachern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Kaytlyn Remedes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Sarah Mccurley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.03
Alicia Thomisee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.86
Tarah Lockard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leah Feldt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Kellogg + Kaytlyn Remedes213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Lisa Kellogg
12W–10L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Paige Ferrant
8W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Martha Silva
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%81%19%
2.38
Julie McEachern
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14
Kaytlyn Remedes
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Sarah Mccurley
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
2.5
Alicia Thomisee
2W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03
Tarah Lockard
4W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86
Leah Feldt
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Lowe
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.