Teams

BCST NAVY

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-27vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 SinglesJoe Kroog vs Curtis Crites6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRoger Williams vs Richard Frisz6-4, 6-3
2024-05-20vs KC-RH BLUEWon 20
W#1 DoublesJeff Todd / Roger Williams vs Dave Joscelyne / Adam Ward6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJoe Kroog vs Ryan Wilson6-3, 7-5
2024-05-13vs GR ORANGELost 01
L#1 DoublesRoger Williams / Steve Monroe vs Drake Busch / Nick Hantge4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-06vs BM GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeff Young / Joe Kroog vs Gary Farmar / Gregory Gleason6-1, 7-5
W#2 SinglesRoger Williams vs Peter Malone6-3, 6-2
2024-04-29vs MC GREENWon 20
W#2 DoublesJoe Kroog / John Lange vs Cordell BaanHofman / Francis Vigil6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRoger Williams / James Barwick vs WILLIAM HITCHCOCK / John Koziol6-2, 7-5
2024-04-22vs KC-CC YELLOWWon 10
W#1 SinglesJoe Kroog vs Roger Torres6-1, 6-2
2024-04-15vs KC-RH BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Williams / Steve Monroe vs Rob Pine / Orlando Colamatteo6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Jeff Todd
published
3.00
Roger Williams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Joe Kroog
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.61
Steve Monroe
published
2.51
James Barwick
published
2.46
Randall Look
published
2.43
John Lange
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steve Monroe + Joe Kroog4159% games+8.8% vs expected
Roger Williams + Joe Kroog13260% games+7.2% vs expected
Steve Monroe + Roger Williams3346% gamesnot enough data
John Lange + Randall Look033 matchesnot enough data
Randall Look + James Barwick123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Todd
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Roger Williams
121W–125L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Joe Kroog
70W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Steve Monroe
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
James Barwick
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Randall Look
6W–17L career · no lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
2.46
John Lange
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.