Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC)

2022 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE · 3.0 ADULT WOMEN

17 players · average NTRP 2.92 / GREATER EL PASO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-11-02vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)Won 32
W#1 DoublesRenee Neessen / Allene Mirazo vs Thelma Campos / Annette Segesman6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShirley Cervantes vs Yvana Sanchez4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaya I Quevedo / Paige Fox vs Caroline Mason / Jessie Lindsay6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesErika Avila vs Leyla Ochoa2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaryn Hunt / Selyna Wallace vs Leyla Ramirez / Marcela Calderon2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-09-14vs GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cunningham)(TW)Won 41
W#1 DoublesCathy Castro / Renee Neessen vs Annette Segesman / Michele Cicchetti6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShirley Cervantes vs Marcela Calderon6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllene Mirazo / Paige Fox vs Angelica Alarcon / Carolina Gaytan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLeslie Zaragoza vs Yvana Sanchez7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSelyna Wallace / Cha Cha Schatzman vs Luisana Montoya / Yamili Bagby4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2020-08-11vs GEPTA-3.5-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#4)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCathy Castro vs Miranda Silva1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Zaragoza / Allene Mirazo vs Rose Rivera / Silvia Frontini5-7, 5-7
2019-05-23Lost 02
L#2 DoublesTaryn Hunt / Cindy Miles vs Susan Daw / Barbara Barton1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCathy Castro vs Araceli Gaytan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Erika Avila
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.84
Allene Mirazo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Cathy Castro
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
2.31
Cindy Miles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.27
Cha Cha Schatzman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Keithley Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Zaragoza
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Maya I Quevedo
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michelle Jabor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Misty Duke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Molly Stoltzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paige Fox
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Renee Neessen
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Selyna Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shirley Cervantes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Taryn Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Castro + Allene Mirazo6749% games+2.0% vs expected
Taryn Hunt + Michelle Jabor102640% games−1.7% vs expected
Allene Mirazo + Paige Fox4742% games−2.4% vs expected
Cindy Miles + Michelle Jabor3742% games−4.3% vs expected
Misty Duke + Cathy Castro7555% gamesnot enough data
Allene Mirazo + Keithley Stanley3447% gamesnot enough data
Misty Duke + Allene Mirazo2442% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Miles + Cha Cha Schatzman1536% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Avila
76W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Allene Mirazo
66W–72L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Cathy Castro
37W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
2.79
3
Alexandra Alvarez
5W–9L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Cindy Miles
21W–50L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Cha Cha Schatzman
18W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Keithley Stanley
49W–28L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Zaragoza
55W–49L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Maya I Quevedo
29W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Jabor
55W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Misty Duke
27W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Molly Stoltzman
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Paige Fox
14W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Renee Neessen
15W–17L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Selyna Wallace
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Shirley Cervantes
75W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Taryn Hunt
36W–74L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.