Teams

Su.Braga18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.14 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-27vs Ma.Cambo18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Megan Slocum vs Kelsey Brandt / Sarah Forman3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Suzanne Braga vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-16vs Ki.Manning18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesMegan Slocum / Tina Goertz vs Melissa Weber / Stephanie Fogarty3-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Ga.Scoggin18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesTina Goertz / Suzanne Braga vs Alisa Smith / Charlotte Mercer6-2, 7-5
2025-06-19vs Je.SagalSolomon18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesChrissy Hartsfield / Tina Goertz vs Dana Earle / Jennifer Kimball0-6, 0-6
2025-06-12vs La.Fye18T4.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Jaime Clark vs Lauren Fye / Jennifer Anderson1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Slocum / Laurel Saunders vs Merab Puleo / Terri Bartucca2-6, 5-7
2025-05-22vs To.Sutler18TLost 01
L#2 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Sarah Copley vs Jessica Williams / Jennifer Kaulback7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kendra Allen
published
3.29
Joanne Kearney
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.20
Jaime Clark
published 3.5
3.13
Paige Alford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Laurel Saunders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Megan Slocum
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
2.40
Jill Orr
published
2.35
Tina Goertz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Nikki Hastings
published
Shelley Truman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Braga + Megan Slocum3252% games+1.3% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Laurel Saunders1745% games+1.3% vs expected
Paige Alford + Joanne Kearney3353% gamesnot enough data
Tina Goertz + Megan Slocum1445% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kendra Allen
21W–30L career · no lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Joanne Kearney
270W–161L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jaime Clark
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–138L career · 6 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
3
Laurel Saunders
40W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Megan Slocum
32W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Jill Orr
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Tina Goertz
83W–199L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35
Nikki Hastings
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shelley Truman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.