Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Delgado)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-03-27Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCamila Olmos vs Stephanie Abelleyra6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMayra Reza / Laura Akemi Aizawa vs Monica Medina / Angelica Neve0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.11
Daniela Baylon
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.09
Camila Olmos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.79
Brenda Campos Chacon
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.78
Dania Cuellar
published 3
Dimna Arias
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Ericka Alvarez
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
Hilda Gonzales
published
Hossana Gallegos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ida Santillan
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 43% · published
Laura Akemi Aizawa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Alexandra Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mayra Reza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Solis
published
Myrna Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Zaira Delgado
usually #1 Doubles 26%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mayra Reza + Dimna Arias213 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Campos Chacon + Daniela Baylon213 matchesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + Myrna Dominguez033 matchesnot enough data
Dania Cuellar + Daniela Baylon213 matchesnot enough data
Hossana Gallegos + Hilda Gonzales123 matchesnot enough data
Myrna Dominguez + Hilda Gonzales033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Daniela Baylon
42W–21L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Camila Olmos
28W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Brenda Campos Chacon
25W–15L career · 14 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dania Cuellar
24W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.78
Dimna Arias
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ericka Alvarez
1W–6L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Hilda Gonzales
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Hossana Gallegos
18W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ida Santillan
25W–13L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Akemi Aizawa
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Maria Alexandra Herrera
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mayra Reza
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Solis
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Myrna Dominguez
6W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zaira Delgado
54W–34L career · 21 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.