Teams

LA - Sets and the City

2026 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · LA - Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LA - Sets and the City000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Esther Nordlinger
published
2.90
Eleanor DeMartino
published
2.88
Brooke Horowitz
published 3
Blair Lawson
published 3
2.74
Robin Rosen
published
2.73
Stefanie Hall
published
2.68
Michele Sanchez
published
2.67
Jenna Gambaro
published
2.66
Diane Wagner
published 3
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
published
2.59
Sarah Noonan
published
2.52
Alexandra Sann
published 3
2.50
Gina Petersen
published
2.46
Melissa Karz
published
2.44
Liz Rosman
published
2.43
2.33
Portia Furst
published
2.29
Hilary Angelo
published
2.26
2.09
Gloria Hann
published
Jocelyn Hayes
published
Lynn Loeb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefanie Hall + Jenna Gambaro3261% games+14.0% vs expected
Liz Rosman + Gina Petersen6254% games+4.0% vs expected
Raquelle de la Rocha + Portia Furst123 matchesnot enough data
Jenna Gambaro + Alexandra Sann123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Esther Nordlinger
23W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
Eleanor DeMartino
13W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Brooke Horowitz
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Blair Lawson
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Robin Rosen
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Stefanie Hall
5W–11L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Michele Sanchez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jenna Gambaro
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Diane Wagner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Nicki Jaeger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Sarah Noonan
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
3
Alexandra Sann
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Gina Petersen
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Melissa Karz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
2.46
Liz Rosman
19W–13L career · no lines in 2026
0%67%33%
2.44
3
Alison Cole-kelly
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.43
Portia Furst
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Hilary Angelo
2W–8L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29
Raquelle de la Rocha
16W–10L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
Gloria Hann
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Jocelyn Hayes
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Lynn Loeb
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.