Teams

Kozar/18/3.5/WD/UC

2024 City Championship 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 3.5 (18&O) Women Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Kozar/18/3.5/WD/UC71291127285
2Bogan/18/3.5/WD/BRCC71271330275
3Cook/18/3.5/WD/BREC53251538334
4Jeansonne/18/3.5/WD/BOC53211944356
5SELLERS/18/3.5/WD/CCLA35182248365
6Labbe/18/3.5/WD/BREC35202049381
7Bordelon/18/3.5/WD/BREC35162455389
8LaNasa/18/3.5/WD/CCLA26142653405
9Moody/18/3.5/WD/BREC17103066418

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Maria Pereira
published
3.68
Lisa Marie Raiford
published
3.59
Jenny Kern
published
3.46
Hollie Easterling
published 3.5
3.45
Remy Curry
published
3.43
Kristine Jones
published
3.37
Renee Simoneaux
published
3.35
Jenna Kozar
published
3.26
Megan Beecham
published
Ashley Wegmann
published 3.5
Connie Allred
published 3.5
3.24
Sarah Musgrove
published
3.24
Marcia Weger
published
3.22
Leanne Palma
published
3.19
Cindy Kelley
published 3.5
3.06
Shona McCoy
published
Jennifer Tolbert
published
Leslie Broussard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Simoneaux + Megan Beecham3263% games+16.9% vs expected
Megan Beecham + Hollie Easterling7362% games+6.3% vs expected
Jenna Kozar + Hollie Easterling7260% games+6.3% vs expected
Leslie Broussard + Maria Pereira11264% games+5.1% vs expected
Sarah Musgrove + Jenny Kern4249% games+1.5% vs expected
Shona McCoy + Megan Beecham134 matchesnot enough data
Leanne Palma + Marcia Weger123 matchesnot enough data
Renee Simoneaux + Jenna Kozar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Pereira
85W–28L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
Lisa Marie Raiford
65W–88L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Jenny Kern
110W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Hollie Easterling
68W–36L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
Remy Curry
39W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
Kristine Jones
22W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Renee Simoneaux
27W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%15%
3.37
Jenna Kozar
36W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.35
Megan Beecham
41W–30L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Ashley Wegmann
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Connie Allred
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Musgrove
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Marcia Weger
57W–60L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Leanne Palma
26W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Cindy Kelley
31W–28L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.19
Shona McCoy
15W–33L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Tolbert
19W–16L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Leslie Broussard
42W–32L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.