Teams

McKenna/Doer DAY

2025 South East Tennis Combo 55 & over · Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-20vs Randall/Weidlein DAYLost 12
L#1 DoublesDianne McKenna / Sheryl Doerr vs Clarke Weidlein / Sabrina Nikel4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Robinson / Luanne Basile vs Susan Barry / Lisa Toomey4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJanet Harbeck / Paula Bachman vs Ann Schuelke / Karen O'Connor3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-10-17vs Adams 7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Bachman / Joyce Jordan vs Rebecca Durham / Debbie Trafton3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Gallagher / Holly Yoo vs Nancy Wilcox / Kim Morris6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSheryl Doerr / Luanne Basile vs Patti Sizemore / Anne Milkes6-4, 6-3
2025-10-07vs Richard/BrownfieldLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Antonelli / Luanne Basile vs Joan Proctor / Peggy O'Connell1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJosie Whitmore / Dianne McKenna vs Karen Wall / Kelli Brownfield2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPaula Bachman / Joyce Jordan vs Carrie Guerrette / Cheryl Matsche6-4, 7-5
2025-10-04vs Tatum 7.5 - 55sLost 02
L#1 DoublesPaula Bachman / Joyce Jordan vs Eileen Hendrick / Leslie Seidel7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Harbeck / Luanne Basile vs Martha Broadbent / Christine Tatum6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-09-24vs Davidson 55+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesHolly Yoo / Luanne Basile vs Betty Mahoney / Maureen Fehrs2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCindy Antonelli / Donna Robinson vs Stacey Anderson / Sarah McKenzie1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoyce Jordan / Josie Whitmore vs Denise Vliet / Patti Kucan1-6, 1-6
2025-09-17vs CAMPBELLLost 03
L#1 DoublesSheryl Doerr / Joyce Jordan vs Debra Jones / Kim Byrd6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Gallagher / Dianne McKenna vs Kelly Godfrey / Liz Govoni2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGeorgina Dillon / Donna Robinson vs Sue Griffin / Lena White0-6, 5-7
2025-09-13vs Roberson/Kunze (Day)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSheryl Doerr / Luanne Basile vs Kathleen Bradcovich / Birgitta Jonsson-Seal2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoyce Jordan / Paula Bachman vs Debbie Canty / Maria Weese4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDianne McKenna / Georgina Dillon vs Sarah Martin / Connie Wilson4-6, 0-6
2025-09-08vs Welch-McCallLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Gallagher / Holly Yoo vs Adair Wright / Kelly Ochsner6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonna Robinson / Janet Harbeck vs Odette Arnold / Barbara Pennington2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Antonelli / Josie Whitmore vs Kendall Welch / Mary Holland1-6, 3-6
2025-08-27vs Bowen/HartWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Harbeck / Joyce Jordan vs Laura Bowen / Kathleen Leone7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesHolly Yoo / Betsy Gallagher vs Jonnie Harris / Anna Martin6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDianne McKenna / Luanne Basile vs Jo Ellen Myers / Kelly Strickland7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Holly Yoo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.37
Joyce Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.34
Sheryl Doerr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Dianne McKenna
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.21
Luanne Basile
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.21
Paula Bachman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
Cindy Antonelli
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Janet Harbeck
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.84
Georgina Dillon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Josie Whitmore
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Bachman + Joyce Jordan7653% games+12.1% vs expected
Luanne Basile + Sheryl Doerr224 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Jordan + Sheryl Doerr314 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Jordan + Janet Harbeck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Holly Yoo
1W–5L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joyce Jordan
26W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Sheryl Doerr
7W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Dianne McKenna
5W–8L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luanne Basile
5W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Paula Bachman
11W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Cindy Antonelli
16W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
Janet Harbeck
9W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Georgina Dillon
2W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.84
Josie Whitmore
3W–8L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.