Teams

MD.Winzenz

2023 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-22vs TOC.SziksaiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Winzenz / Jillian Sloand vs Erin McAllister / Sharon Baggett6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Amy Rogers vs Miho Ogura / Emily Starritt4-6, 1-6
2023-07-20vs TOC.SziksaiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Winzenz / Jillian Sloand vs Betsy Shane / Erika Linnander7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAmy Rogers / Sally Grogan vs Button Hall / Terry Perrone3-6, 4-6
2023-07-10vs TOC.SchloemannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Cindy Winzenz vs Allison Graves / Amy Sams4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarbara Campbell / Sally Grogan vs Paige Jennings / Angela Ray4-6, 4-6
2023-06-27vs TOC.SchloemannSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Alena Spielberg vs Jackie Lee / Anna Tomkins2-6, 4-3
L#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Jennifer Moses vs Angela Ray / Laura Ross3-6, 3-6
2023-06-12vs TOC.SchloemannLost 02
L#1 DoublesCharlotte Burnett / Cindy Winzenz vs Amy Sams / Tracy Santrock3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmy Rogers / Allie Ligay vs Paige Jennings / Karen Reynders3-6, 4-6
2023-06-05vs TOC.SziksaiWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllie Ligay / Amy Rogers vs Emily Starritt / Jeanie White6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Cindy Winzenz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.97
Alena Spielberg
published 4.5
3.97
Charlotte Burnett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.58
Allie Ligay
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.54
Susan Bowser
published
3.28
Sally Grogan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Moses
published
3.09
Claire Cesta
published 3.5
Kathleen Cannon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Winzenz + Charlotte Burnett1441% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Winzenz
87W–67L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alena Spielberg
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Charlotte Burnett
13W–25L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
3.5
Allie Ligay
203W–66L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.58
Susan Bowser
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Sally Grogan
66W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Jennifer Moses
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Claire Cesta
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.09
Kathleen Cannon
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.