Teams

deOliva/Matthews

2022 SOUTH EAST TENNIS MIXED DOUBLES 40 & OVER · MIXED 40 & OVER 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-08vs KyselyLost 01
L#2 DoublesTracie McCabe / Bryan McCabe vs Denise Granados / Gregor Kysely7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-07-26vs VAUGHNCCL MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Bryan McCabe vs Allan Middleton / Shannon Stephens6-0, 6-1
2022-07-18vs Broach/Ferner PVCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesBryan McCabe / Tracie McCabe vs Clayton Ferner / Angelia Gallimore6-3, 6-3
2022-06-26vs KyselyWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Bryan McCabe vs Elizabeth Claus / Derek Mickler6-4, 6-3
2022-06-23vs VAUGHNCCL MixedWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Bryan McCabe vs Justin Miller / Christian Miller6-4, 6-3
2022-06-16vs EasomWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracie McCabe / Bryan McCabe vs Jon Easom / Debra Jones6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 40 & OVER 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Brendan Bastable
published 4
3.91
Tracie McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.87
Jackie Cruse
published 4
3.76
Bryan McCabe
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.74
Ashley Doyle
published 4
3.60
Jodi Adams
published
3.36
Lisa Brandkamp
published
3.36
Terry Cruse
published
3.21
Pati DeOliva
published
3.20
Evelyn Foster
published 3.5
3.19
Michael Scordato
published
3.07
Dorian Williams
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie McCabe + Bryan McCabe411760% games+2.5% vs expected
Ashley Doyle + Brendan Bastable4646% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brendan Bastable
38W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Tracie McCabe
279W–99L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Jackie Cruse
38W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Bryan McCabe
224W–123L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Ashley Doyle
22W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
Jodi Adams
6W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Lisa Brandkamp
30W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Terry Cruse
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
Pati DeOliva
27W–34L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Evelyn Foster
28W–20L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Michael Scordato
22W–25L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dorian Williams
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.