Teams

You Had Me At Tennis 40+

2022 Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRayane Clark / Tannan Hagyard vs Julie Perks / Susan Moody0-6, 1-6
2022-07-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesAmity Tripp / Lee WILLIAMS vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-28vs We Got This 2! 40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesAngela Helder / Lynn Barber vs Shirin Ahmed / Alecia Brinkley6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLee WILLIAMS / Delaney Burkart vs Grace Gourdine / Pratima Lele6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-27vs Squirrels in traffic 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesAngela Helder / Anne McKissick vs Cheryl Royce / Elise Steinberg7-5, 6-3
2022-06-20vs Shepard's Flock 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne McKissick / Michele Barron vs Katie Tetrault / Na Yi0-6, 0-6
2022-06-14vs Slice Girls 40+Won 10
W#1 DoublesLynn Barber / Angela Helder vs Anne Talvacchio / Suzanne Rothwell6-3, 7-6
2022-06-12vs Lucky in Love 40+Split 11
W#2 DoublesAnne McKissick / Anne Conklin vs Kathy Slack / Becky Ronayne6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDale Templeton / Tannan Hagyard vs Betsy Morris / Carole Veihmeyer5-7, 6-7
2022-05-14Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMichele Barron / Anne McKissick vs Karin Johansen / Christine Dotson4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAngela Gardner / Tannan Hagyard vs Margaret Sybert / Maryanne Gruys2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Angela Helder
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Lee WILLIAMS
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Anne McKissick
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.75
Angela Gardner
published 3
2.75
Shannon Biggs
published
2.53
Anne Conklin
published 3
2.34
Tannan Hagyard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.04
Dale Templeton
published 2.5
Jin Lee
published
Michele Barron
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shannon Biggs + Tannan Hagyard213 matchesnot enough data
Anne McKissick + Angela Helder213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Helder
98W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.35
3
Lee WILLIAMS
50W–47L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
3
Anne McKissick
94W–129L career · 7 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Angela Gardner
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Shannon Biggs
18W–30L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anne Conklin
8W–14L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
2.5
Tannan Hagyard
36W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%90%10%
2.34
2.5
Dale Templeton
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Jin Lee
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Barron
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.