Teams

SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ Federhart

2025 Mixed Doubles 55 & Over Spring- Combined SD · SDNC

13 players · average NTRP 3.85 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Billy Arenas
published 4
3.89
Andrew Mikschl
published 4
3.85
Kimberly Hegardt
published 4
3.77
3.67
Rand Smith
published 4
3.66
Debra Reilly
published 4
3.64
Steve Firestone
published
3.45
Helen Bruton
published 4
3.42
Sanjiv Madan
published 3.5
3.35
Ping Chen
published
3.32
Derek Bruton
published 3.5
3.24
Carole Farr
published 3.5
John Broderick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Bruton + Andrew Mikschl10455% games+6.5% vs expected
Helen Bruton + Rand Smith4842% gamesnot enough data
Billy Arenas + Kimberly Hegardt2342% gamesnot enough data
Billy Arenas + Helen Bruton224 matchesnot enough data
Debra Reilly + Rand Smith213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Billy Arenas
68W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4
Andrew Mikschl
68W–39L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
4
Kimberly Hegardt
47W–50L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Shelley Federhart
61W–74L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Rand Smith
94W–100L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
4
Debra Reilly
121W–145L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Steve Firestone
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.64
4
Helen Bruton
96W–107L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
3.5
Sanjiv Madan
38W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.42
Ping Chen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Derek Bruton
41W–64L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Carole Farr
46W–79L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
John Broderick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.