Teams

Johnson, Christopher

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-11-23vs Nagy, KyleLost 03
L#1 DoublesKendall Kaut / Terry Brown vs Alexander Maher / Scott Doherty3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPreston Lagemann / Christopher Johnson vs Bruce Alexander / Grant Minson1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEdward Sien / Matthew Reid vs Kyle Nagy / Terry Shaffer0-6, 0-6
2024-10-19vs Nagy, KyleLost 03
L#1 DoublesBen Parkes / Wayne Giboney vs Alexander Maher / Brandon Bohning4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMark Raggett / Josh Beham vs Scott Doherty / Adam Stuhr2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJason Norberg / Edward Sien vs Bruce Alexander / Alan Fuchsman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Wes Mikel
published
2.92
Jeff Ogg
published
2.90
Kendall Kaut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Ben Parkes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Matthew Reid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Jason Norberg
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Wayne Giboney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Chad Vulgamott
published 3
2.40
Mark Raggett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Edward Sien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Josh Beham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Preston Lagemann
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendall Kaut + Jeff Ogg3250% gamesnot enough data
Chad Vulgamott + Wayne Giboney134 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Giboney + Jason Norberg044 matchesnot enough data
Edward Sien + Matthew Reid044 matchesnot enough data
Jeff Ogg + Wes Mikel213 matchesnot enough data
Wayne Giboney + Edward Sien033 matchesnot enough data
Jason Norberg + Mark Raggett123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wes Mikel
34W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Jeff Ogg
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Kendall Kaut
11W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Ben Parkes
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Matthew Reid
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Jason Norberg
5W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.54
Wayne Giboney
3W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Chad Vulgamott
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Mark Raggett
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.40
Edward Sien
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.32
Josh Beham
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Preston Lagemann
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.