Teams

Gilliam/FS/CM

2025 Fall Into Doubles · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-01-08vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Mitzi Efurd vs Jenny Wilkerson / Morgan Kremers2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Madelyn Sturgill vs Emma Robertson / Nancy Kremers6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKatie Hug / Savannah Selman vs Madeline Jamison / Stephanie Neidecker1-6, 2-6
2025-12-17vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Stephanie Selman vs Stacy Seeger / Maria Lovell4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Sturgill / Liz Jumper vs Carrie Medlyn / Sara Rahmani1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Hug / Mitzi Efurd vs Jeanette Mccain / Katie Gibbs2-6, 0-6
2025-12-11vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Savannah Selman vs Tobi Wilkins / Sara Rahmani6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Sturgill / Liz Jumper vs Jessica Riggins / Maria Lovell0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Monique Bracken vs Jeanette Mccain / Sally Bracken7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-12-03vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Stephanie Selman vs Sally Bracken / Sara Rahmani6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMadelyn Sturgill / Liz Jumper vs Teresa Williams / Stacy Seeger4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSavannah Selman / Katie Hug vs Savannah Lopez / Tobi Wilkins0-6, 0-6
2025-11-17vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Selman / Emily Humphrey vs Hunter Martin / Cristy Harp5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadelyn Sturgill / Liz Jumper vs Lori Forsgren / Stephanie Neidecker4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSavannah Selman / Cindy Steed vs Morgan Kremers / Madeline Jamison1-6, 0-6
2025-11-12vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Monique Bracken vs Wendy Mullens / Cristy Harp5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStephanie Selman / Mitzi Efurd vs Jenny Wilkerson / Morgan Kremers2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Madelyn Sturgill vs Sharon Guzman / Nancy Kremers6-3, 7-6
2025-10-07vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesNichole Surber / Emily Humphrey vs Joanna Ayala / Emma Robertson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Mitzi Efurd vs Madeline Jamison / Melissa Schoenfeld6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngel Geels / Katie Hug vs Sharon Guzman / Sara Rahmani4-6, 1-6
2025-10-02vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 02
L#1 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Caitlin Conner vs Brooke Runser / Madison Geels4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephanie Selman / Savannah Selman vs Sara Rahmani / Emily Knoll4-6, 6-7
2025-08-08vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 01
L#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Jennifer Smith vs Morgan Kremers / Jennifer Jenkins1-6, 4-6
2025-06-10vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 10
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Amy Roffine vs Morgan Kremers / Nancy Kremers7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Glenna Gilliam
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.64
Emily Humphrey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Stephanie Selman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.33
Madelyn Sturgill
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.31
Liz Jumper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Steed
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.09
Monique Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.93
Mitzi Efurd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Katie Hug
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Savannah Selman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Jumper + Madelyn Sturgill134 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Selman + Emily Humphrey303 matchesnot enough data
Glenna Gilliam + Mitzi Efurd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Glenna Gilliam
49W–32L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Emily Humphrey
18W–7L career · type D · 6 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
2.64
Stephanie Selman
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41
Madelyn Sturgill
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Liz Jumper
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.31
2.5
Cindy Steed
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Monique Bracken
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Mitzi Efurd
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Katie Hug
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Savannah Selman
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.