Teams

WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL Hansen

2024 WI Combo · WI Combo 6.5 Mixed

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-01vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoan Frericks / Joseph Vinopal vs Meredith Congdon / Lars Smith7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPam Weider / C H vs Marc Stolt / Amber Garbe4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAlanna Anderson / Mike Anderson vs La Rue Davison / Cory Woytasik2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-12-01vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJustin Busa / Pam Weider vs Meredith Congdon / Gary Congdon2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDonna Hansen / C H vs La Rue Davison / Lars Smith1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Frericks / Joseph Vinopal vs Amber Garbe / Marc Stolt4-6, 4-6
2024-11-30vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Hansen / Lars Smith vs Meredith Congdon / Justin Busa6-4, 7-5
2024-11-30vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesDonna Hansen / William Hlavac vs Meredith Congdon / C H6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPam Weider / Justin Busa vs Brooke Filtz / Joseph Vinopal0-6, 4-6
2024-11-09vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonLost 03
L#1 DoublesMike Anderson / Alanna Anderson vs La Rue Davison / Cory Woytasik2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesC H / Meghan Busa vs Gary Congdon / Hannah Congdon3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Hansen / Justin Busa vs Meredith Congdon / Ken Wilcox5-7, 3-6
2024-11-09vs WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL CongdonLost 12
W#1 DoublesJustin Busa / Meghan Busa vs Gary Congdon / Hannah Congdon6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDonna Hansen / C H vs Meredith Congdon / Ken Wilcox2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlanna Anderson / Mike Anderson vs La Rue Davison / Cory Woytasik2-6, 2-6
2024-11-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Hansen / William Hlavac vs C H / Pam Weider6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Combo 6.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL Congdon40102687
2WI Combo 6.5 Mixed NCL Hansen0421021136

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Alanna Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Donna Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joan Frericks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Meghan Busa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Pam Weider
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alanna Anderson
8W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Donna Hansen
16W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joan Frericks
11W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Meghan Busa
16W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pam Weider
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.