Teams

Buttonwood - Palma

2024 IRMSL Combo 50 & Over · 8.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.20 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-11-24vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Samoluk / Sandy Palma vs Laura Williams / Susan Gore2-6, 3-6
2024-11-17vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Marguerite Madden vs Lisa Wigley / Deborah Cone7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDina Cummings / Pollyanna Clark vs Maria Vallecillo-Dunn / Carolyn Strong6-0, 6-2
2024-11-10vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPamela Houri / Elisabeth Smith vs Christina Lovera / Laura Williams1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDina Cummings / Pollyanna Clark vs Deborah Cone / Brenda Gimpl6-0, 7-5
2024-11-03vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WLost 02
L#1 DoublesPollyanna Clark / Beth Daly vs Laura Williams / Kathleen Bourret1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLori Glaspey / Sandy Palma vs Juliann Zoetmulder / Carolyn Strong7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-10-30vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesGuadalupe Avinzano / Elisabeth Smith vs Deborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPollyanna Clark / Sandy Palma vs Maria Vallecillo-Dunn / Brenda Gimpl6-3, 6-4
2024-10-13vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Palma / Marguerite Madden vs Susan Gore / Laura Williams6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPamela Houri / Elisabeth Smith vs Deborah Cone / Kathleen Bourret2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Daly / Guadalupe Avinzano vs Karin Decoste / Lisa Thiesen5-7, 4-6
2024-10-05vs IRMSL/Fulper/50&over8.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarguerite Madden / Dina Cummings vs Deborah Cone / Rebecca Fulper4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPollyanna Clark / Beth Daly vs Karin Decoste / Lisa Wigley6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGuadalupe Avinzano / Sandy Palma vs Laura Williams / Christina Lovera2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Marguerite Madden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Guadalupe Avinzano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Pollyanna Clark
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.96
Dina Cummings
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.84
Lori Glaspey
published
3.84
Sandy Palma
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 46% · published
3.79
Pamela Houri
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Elisabeth Smith
published 4
3.61
Beth Daly
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Palma + Pamela Houri6163% games+13.4% vs expected
Pamela Houri + Lori Glaspey9559% games+7.1% vs expected
Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% games−2.0% vs expected
Sandy Palma + Marguerite Madden8453% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Guadalupe Avinzano4446% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Marguerite Madden3446% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Guadalupe Avinzano3250% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Houri + Dina Cummings404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Marguerite Madden
114W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Guadalupe Avinzano
101W–66L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
4.14
Pollyanna Clark
25W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4
Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.96
Lori Glaspey
13W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
Pamela Houri
64W–68L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.