Teams

KSandy (Charlotte Indoor)

2022 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-29vs KBowman (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKay Dugan / Gillian Murrell vs Karen Bowman / Sandy Johnson1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Carol Guinn vs Faye Childress / Kathi Todd2-6, 3-6
2022-04-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Lucas / Joan Slep vs Karen Foster / Lynda Snider1-6, 1-6
2022-04-08vs LCranford (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesKrista Sandy / Joan Slep vs Mia Delmontagne / Sandra Holmes6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGillian Murrell / Kate Blankenship vs Cathie DeCramer / Laura Weisner4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-04-01vs BBrown (Park Crossing)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Slep / Kay Dugan vs Allison Woerner / Cherie Bouchon7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-11vs JGieker (Life Time)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGillian Murrell / Pamela Faile vs Julie Gieker / Wendi Peters6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoan Slep / Brenda Davis vs Kim Aquila / Tiffani Wagner3-6, 2-6
2022-03-04Won 20
W#1 DoublesKrista Sandy / Joan Slep vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesLaura Lucas / Joan Slep vs Pam Richardson / Donna Krasner4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGillian Murrell / Brenda Davis vs Laurie Hoots / Rebecca Shore2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Pamela Faile
published
3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
3.01
Joan Slep
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.94
Gillian Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Maureen Genser
published
2.46
Kay Dugan
published
2.34
Carol Guinn
published 3
Krista Sandy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Blankenship + Gillian Murrell2545% games−7.5% vs expected
Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.8% vs expected
Kay Dugan + Carol Guinn044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela Faile
18W–18L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Kate Blankenship
5W–19L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
2.94
Maureen Genser
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Kay Dugan
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Carol Guinn
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
89%11%<1%
2.34
Krista Sandy
11W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.