Teams

Hunter

2022 Loudoun Adult Other Winter Afternoon Doubles Women · Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 4.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 4.25 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-18vs OGILIVEWon 10
W#1 DoublesJennifer Hunter / Jenni Bae vs Linda Bhangdia / Angie Wong7-5, 6-2
2022-03-11vs OGILIVEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJenni Bae / Blair Reid vs Cheryl Danner / Noriko Hoffman6-1, 6-1
2022-02-28vs OGILIVELost 01
L#2 DoublesJutta Nohra / Kay Bransford vs Linda Bhangdia / Cathy Huh4-6, 5-7
2022-02-24vs OGILIVEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBlair Reid / Colleen Stoltz vs Vanessa Ogilvie / Linda Bhangdia6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJutta Nohra / Kay Bransford vs Allison Broadbent / Cheryl Danner6-2, 6-2
2022-02-07vs OGILIVEWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Snyder / Jenni Bae vs Noriko Hoffman / Cathy Huh7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-02vs OGILIVELost 01
L#3 DoublesBrenda Bosch / Kay Bransford vs Susan Spector / Tracey White6-7, 5-7
2022-01-24vs OGILIVEWon 10
W#2 DoublesBlair Reid / Brenda Bosch vs Angie Wong / Linda Bhangdia7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult Other Afternoon Doubles 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Erin Green
published 4.5
Colleen Stoltz
published 4.5
4.05
Blair Reid
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4.5
3.90
Kim Miller
published
3.74
Jenni Bae
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
Kay Bransford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Brenda Bosch
published 4
Jennifer Hunter
published
Jutta Nohra
published
Kecia Brown
published
Virginia Greenlaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blair Reid + Jenni Bae6065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Erin Green
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
4.33
4.5
Colleen Stoltz
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Blair Reid
157W–48L career · 9 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
4.05
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Jenni Bae
211W–85L career · 8 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Kay Bransford
304W–204L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Brenda Bosch
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Jennifer Hunter
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jutta Nohra
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kecia Brown
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Virginia Greenlaw
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.