Teams

CR BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-18vs RRTC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesWilliam Epping / Zac Storatz vs Paul Jaszewski / Tyler Sweeney3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesNick Taylor vs Robert Brown2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMike Lampi / Robert Gabriel vs Jason Bisanti / Matthew Mendez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Olds / Gustavo Belloso vs Kartik Hooda / Steve Zubowicz6-1, 6-3
2022-07-14vs HRCA GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesNick Taylor / David Hitchings vs Matt Culig / Cody Mckay6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBen Caruso vs Christopher Wiksten3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMike Lampi / Robert Gabriel vs Miguel Phelps / Mark Stangeland1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Zac Storatz vs Thomas Larsen / Brian Swift6-2, 6-3
2022-07-11vs SSLT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Hitchings / Michael Olds vs Michael Alexander / Alex Le4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRyan James vs Jose Amador3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Zac Storatz vs Randy Mancherian / Dan Murphy1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMike Lampi / William Epping vs Todd Yokomichi / Mike MacDonnell1-6, 1-6
2022-06-27vs HRCA BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesMike Lampi / Nick Taylor vs Randy Skalla / Bill Childs4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesZac Storatz vs Landon Switzer7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Ryan James vs Troy Warrick / Tony Gerome6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMichael Olds / David Hitchings vs Brian Crawley / Andy Newton6-7, 2-6
2022-06-22vs SSLT BLUELost 04
L#1 DoublesGustavo Belloso / William Epping vs Jose Amador / Eric Stromberg2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesMichael Olds vs Tomo Watanabe1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan James / Nick Taylor vs Randy Mancherian / Will Essin1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMike Lampi / Zac Storatz vs Michael Alexander / Aaron Kirkpatrick2-6, 1-6
2022-06-20vs LTFC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMike Lampi / William Epping vs Christopher Hillary / Mickey Plotkin2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesGustavo Belloso vs Tom Patterson2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBen Caruso / Robert Gabriel vs Natan Ashkenazi / James Jaggers3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRyan James / Zac Storatz vs KC Agrelius / Brian Vickery4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-13vs RRTC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGustavo Belloso / Ben Caruso vs Paul Jaszewski / Tyler Sweeney4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJoseph Fields vs Jason Bisanti1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Epping / Mike Lampi vs David Bennett / Kyle Kickhaefer6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesZac Storatz / Nick Taylor vs Kartik Hooda / Matthew Mendez6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Michael Olds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.22
Nick Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
4.11
Ryan James
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.10
William Epping
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.08
Gustavo Belloso
usually #2 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.06
David Hitchings
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.93
Zac Storatz
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Ben Caruso
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Dennis Coonan
published
Joseph Fields
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Mike Lampi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zac Storatz + Gustavo Belloso3450% games+9.3% vs expected
Zac Storatz + William Epping224 matchesnot enough data
William Epping + Gustavo Belloso314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Olds + David Hitchings044 matchesnot enough data
Mike Lampi + Nick Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Mike Lampi + William Epping123 matchesnot enough data
Zac Storatz + Nick Taylor123 matchesnot enough data
Zac Storatz + David Hitchings123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Olds
15W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
Nick Taylor
17W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
4.22
Ryan James
11W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
4.11
4.5
William Epping
34W–38L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
4.10
4.5
Gustavo Belloso
14W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
David Hitchings
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
4.06
Zac Storatz
25W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
Ben Caruso
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Dennis Coonan
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Fields
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mike Lampi
18W–12L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.