Teams

VC YELLOW

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-16vs CHCC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKatie Portenga / Ti Mougne vs Ann Marie Johnson / Stacey Knox0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBetsy Bengtson vs Julia Brown1-6, 2-6
2024-09-05vs SS-H GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Portenga / Kate Reinemund vs Kristie Gill / Karen Ramon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBetsy Bengtson vs Kerinsa Mullins2-6, 1-1
L#2 DoublesChrissy Coolidge / Carissa Hornbeck vs Suzanne Kwilman / Janet Swanson2-6, 1-1
2024-08-29vs PTC BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesChrissy Coolidge / Ti Mougne vs Shannon Kleinbach / Joy Coulter-Brown2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBetsy Bengtson vs Jena Smith6-1, 6-4
2024-08-15vs GCC NAVYLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Bengtson / Chrissy Coolidge vs Rima Hea / Andrea Howland - Cobb1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Sznewajs vs Heidi Kelly2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesCarissa Hornbeck / Ti Mougne vs Emer Dempsey / Min Baglieri4-6, 2-6
2024-08-01vs EM REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKate Reinemund / Katie Portenga vs Ashley Wolfe / Colley Moe7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKatie Sznewajs vs Melissa Zink1-6, 3-6
2024-07-25vs ATC GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesKate Reinemund / Chrissy Coolidge vs Caroline Rassenfoss / Jackie Brown-Griggs6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Portenga vs Martha Solis-Turner4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTi Mougne / Carissa Hornbeck vs Tami Beardsley / Laurie MacDowell4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Ti Mougne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Kate Reinemund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Betsy Bengtson
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Katie Portenga
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.04
Katie Sznewajs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Carissa Hornbeck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chrissy Coolidge
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ti Mougne + Carissa Hornbeck0537% games−6.1% vs expected
Katie Sznewajs + Kate Reinemund134 matchesnot enough data
Kate Reinemund + Chrissy Coolidge224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ti Mougne
57W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kate Reinemund
12W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
3.18
3
Betsy Bengtson
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%33%67%
3.06
Katie Portenga
30W–37L career · 4 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.05
3.5
Katie Sznewajs
36W–30L career · 2 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Carissa Hornbeck
11W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Chrissy Coolidge
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.