Teams

Walsh

2026 Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-14vs EstradaWon 21
L#1 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Hal Bloom vs Tom Erdely / Ann Pailthorp1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAine McKee / Gregory Teal vs Christina Akay / Senol Akay6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathy Coyle / Tom Walsh vs James Mullennix / Mary Mullennix6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-30vs EstradaWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Fichtner / William Ravekes vs Senol Akay / Christina Akay6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAine McKee / Gregory Teal vs Mary Mullennix / James Mullennix6-0, 6-1
2026-06-24vs EstradaWon 21
L#1 DoublesKathy Coyle / Hal Bloom vs Tom Erdely / Ann Pailthorp1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Fichtner / Jeffery Tolliver vs James Mullennix / Mary Mullennix6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Ravekes / Meg Daniels vs Jose Toro / Christina Akay6-3, 6-1
2026-06-14vs EstradaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Jeffery Tolliver vs Ragnhild Erdely / Tom Erdely3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesChristine Fichtner / William Ravekes vs Erin Weller / Jose Toro6-3, 6-1
2026-06-07vs EstradaWon 21
L#1 DoublesAine McKee / Gregory Teal vs Ragnhild Erdely / Tom Erdely2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Coyle / Jeffery Tolliver vs Christina Akay / Senol Akay7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHal Bloom / Meg Daniels vs Mary Mullennix / James Mullennix7-5, 6-3
2026-05-31vs EstradaWon 30
W#1 DoublesBonnie Cecil / William Ravekes vs Kelly Kennedy / Patrick Frame7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHal Bloom / Cynthia Wofford vs Ann Pailthorp / Jose Toro6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMeg Daniels / Jeffery Tolliver vs Laura Laabs / Xavier Estrada6-4, 6-4
2026-05-26vs EstradaWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeg Daniels / Shawn Reese vs Mary Mullennix / James Mullennix6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Fichtner / Gregory Teal vs Ragnhild Erdely / Jose Toro6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBonnie Cecil / Jeffery Tolliver vs Xavier Estrada / Erin Weller6-2, 6-3
2026-05-20vs EstradaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCynthia Wofford / Hal Bloom vs Christina Akay / Senol Akay6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKathy Coyle / Shawn Reese vs Ragnhild Erdely / Tom Erdely6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Fichtner / Gregory Teal vs Laura Laabs / Patrick Frame6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Aine McKee
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.12
William Ravekes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.07
Shawn Reese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Cynthia Wofford
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.04
Christine Fichtner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.01
Jeffery Tolliver
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Gregory Teal
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.99
Kathy Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Meg Daniels
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Hal Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Mary Perry
published
2.82
Bonnie Cecil
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Tom Walsh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aine McKee + Gregory Teal191556% games+9.5% vs expected
William Ravekes + Cynthia Wofford9167% games+6.1% vs expected
Hal Bloom + Cynthia Wofford10261% games+0.7% vs expected
Bonnie Cecil + Hal Bloom4165% gamesnot enough data
Cynthia Wofford + Gregory Teal314 matchesnot enough data
Meg Daniels + Hal Bloom123 matchesnot enough data
Meg Daniels + William Ravekes123 matchesnot enough data
Meg Daniels + Gregory Teal123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aine McKee
80W–72L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
3
William Ravekes
121W–88L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.12
Shawn Reese
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.07
3
Cynthia Wofford
180W–137L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.05
3
Christine Fichtner
40W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
3
Jeffery Tolliver
43W–19L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Gregory Teal
59W–37L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
Kathy Coyle
21W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Meg Daniels
79W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Hal Bloom
140W–78L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.87
Mary Perry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Bonnie Cecil
66W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Tom Walsh
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.