Teams

GTC NAVY

2023 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesFrank Porada / Roger Montoya vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-29vs APR-E GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBruce Silver / David Baker vs Bruce Eldredge / William Mahaffy4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesGary Abrams / Ian Graffagna vs Kenneth Moyer / Richard Abernethy6-2, 6-0
2023-08-22vs SKY ORANGEWon 10
W#1 DoublesBruce Silver / Frank Porada vs Kevin Breault / David Bacon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-15vs GPTC REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoger Montoya / Ian Graffagna vs Josh Lozow / Sean OConnor2-6, 2-6
2023-08-08vs GTC GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesRoger Montoya / Ian Graffagna vs Jason Wang / Connor Velvin7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGary Abrams / Bruce Silver vs Boyce Markham / David Richards6-4, 7-6
2023-08-02vs APR-E GREENWon 20
W#1 DoublesIan Graffagna / Roger Montoya vs Mark Kruk / Jack Kirtland6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGary Abrams / Bruce Silver vs Kenneth Moyer / Richard Abernethy2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-08-01vs CACM BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Montoya / Ian Graffagna vs Tobias Krause / Daniel Friesen1-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Suresh Gevaran
published 4
3.79
Ian Graffagna
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.72
Roger Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Bruce Silver
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Gary Abrams
published
Daniel Stover
published 3.5
Frank Porada
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roger Montoya + Ian Graffagna17657% games−0.9% vs expected
Roger Montoya + Suresh Gevaran7455% games−6.7% vs expected
Gary Abrams + Bruce Silver123 matchesnot enough data
Roger Montoya + Bruce Silver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Suresh Gevaran
67W–29L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
4.10
4
Ian Graffagna
24W–21L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Roger Montoya
70W–53L career · 5 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Bruce Silver
287W–193L career · 4 lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.62
Gary Abrams
12W–11L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
3.5
Daniel Stover
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Frank Porada
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.