Teams

UPTA40A/Blinston/Hwy14

2025 UPTA Adult 40 & Over - USTA · 40+ Adult Women - 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-15vs UPTA40A/Dresden/KrocWon 32
L#1 DoublesJennifer Lucas / Brooke Reed vs Denise Prisciandaro / Michelle Frazer3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLeslie Waltz vs Greta Harper7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKristin Bissinger / Tressa Jordan vs Lori Car / Laura Garner7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCamille Adams / Sandy Weston vs Kathleen Ryan / Karen Makepeace5-7, 4-6
W#4 DoublesKathryn Rountree / Celeste Blinston vs Patricia Carek / Ty Warlick6-1, 6-4
2025-04-14vs USTA40A/Eleftheriou/Keowee KeyLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrooke Reed / Sandy Weston vs Dana Loring / Angeline Scheinbaum4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCeleste Blinston / Tressa Jordan vs Cindy Eleftheriou / Karen Penoncello2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMissy Lawlor / Camille Adams vs Deb Galinsky / Pamela Turner2-6, 5-7
W#4 DoublesKathryn Rountree / Leslie Waltz vs Johnna Neri / Gail Wingard6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2025-03-24vs UPTA40A/Clay/ThornbladeWon 32
L#1 DoublesKristin Bissinger / Celeste Blinston vs Kelly Clay / Kristy Rogers7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMona Cooper vs Emily Oglesby4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTressa Jordan / Sandy Weston vs Linda Wilson / Jill Thompson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLeslie Waltz / Kathryn Rountree vs Nancy Rudman / Patricia Gailey6-3, 6-0
W#4 DoublesCamille Adams / Jacque Foster vs Amy Williams / Sena Claxton6-4, 6-0
2025-02-24vs UPTA40A/McGee/GCCLost 14
W#1 DoublesBrooke Reed / Christina Rogers vs Liliana McGee / Veronica Young6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKathryn Rountree vs Karen Culumovic2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKristin Bissinger / Sandy Weston vs Nori Morgan / Traci Hughes7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCeleste Blinston / Jennifer Lucas vs Katherine Sturdevant / Callie Darragh0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesHope Moriarty / Jennifer Smith vs Lindsey Batavia / Kathy Townes5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40+ Adult Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Christina Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Brooke Reed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Celeste Blinston
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Tressa Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Rebecca Maddox
published
3.36
Kathryn Rountree
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.30
Leslie Waltz
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Camille Adams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Jacque Foster
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Sandy Weston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Kristin Bissinger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Hope Moriarty
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Mona Cooper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.77
Missy Lawlor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Camille Adams + Sandy Weston4160% games+9.0% vs expected
Tressa Jordan + Kristin Bissinger3352% games+1.8% vs expected
Celeste Blinston + Kathryn Rountree3255% games+1.4% vs expected
Camille Adams + Jacque Foster3448% games+1.1% vs expected
Leslie Waltz + Kathryn Rountree7453% games+0.9% vs expected
Brooke Reed + Christina Rogers7353% games−7.4% vs expected
Kristin Bissinger + Celeste Blinston3251% gamesnot enough data
Kristin Bissinger + Sandy Weston134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Rogers
28W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Brooke Reed
19W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.59
4
Celeste Blinston
38W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.52
Tressa Jordan
23W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.46
Rebecca Maddox
31W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.41
Kathryn Rountree
44W–24L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Leslie Waltz
57W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.30
3.5
Camille Adams
25W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Jacque Foster
32W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Sandy Weston
18W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
Kristin Bissinger
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.09
Hope Moriarty
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Mona Cooper
34W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Missy Lawlor
12W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.