Teams

Flying Aces

2026 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

11 players · average NTRP 4.79 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-22vs Idaho/Locke/18&Over5.0MSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDylan Gomez vs Sean McDaniel6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGreg Ferney / Mark Mallory vs Alec Tzeng / Isaac Dodd3-6, 4-6
2026-06-17vs Trippin' BallsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesDylan Gomez vs Dan Buckingham4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEric Lim / Kyle Gonelli vs Masimba Ruwo / Kevin Conner4-6, 5-7
2026-06-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesGreg Ferney / Eric Lim vs Casey Austgen / Samuel Bergstrand4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-05-27vs Trippin' BallsWon 10
W#2 DoublesEric Lim / Kyle Gonelli vs Tyler Neill / Paul Christensen6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-18vs Idaho/Locke/18&Over5.0MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKyle Gonelli / Eric Lim vs Isaac Dodd / Tyler Oram7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreg Ferney / Mark Mallory vs Casey Austgen / Ryan Warwick3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Locke/18&Over5.0M6216819173
2Flying Aces44121229256
3Trippin' Balls2681633245

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.78
Mark Nielsen
published 5
4.67
Jack Yount
published 5
4.59
Alex Wong
published 4.5
4.55
Peter Questad
published 5
4.47
Greg Ferney
published 5
4.45
Richard Davey
published 4.5
4.18
Dylan Raymond
published 4.5
Dylan Gomez
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Eric Lim
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kyle Gonelli
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Mallory
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Questad + Mark Nielsen6354% games+5.7% vs expected
Greg Ferney + Alex Wong7165% games−2.2% vs expected
Greg Ferney + Mark Mallory2644% gamesnot enough data
Jack Yount + Alex Wong224 matchesnot enough data
Eric Lim + Kyle Gonelli224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Mark Nielsen
36W–12L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.78
5
Jack Yount
6W–9L career · type S · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.67
4.5
Alex Wong
181W–55L career · no lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.59
5
Peter Questad
120W–45L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
5
Greg Ferney
323W–106L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.47
4.5
Richard Davey
44W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
4.45
4.5
Dylan Raymond
80W–65L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
4.18
Dylan Gomez
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Eric Lim
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Gonelli
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Mallory
22W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.