Teams

Lee/40/5.5/CWN/BREC

2024 BR Southern Combo 40 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 BR (40&O) Women Night

11 players · average NTRP 2.80 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-09-09vs Stupka/40/5.5/CWN/BOCWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Kelly / Lori Stafford vs Ginger Dodd / Caroline Graham7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAngela Finch / Mia Smith vs Sandy Reed / Tara Madison4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDarcy Stafford / Jamie Burgess vs Arlyn Kaufman / Kelly Finan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-29vs Stupka/40/5.5/CWN/BOCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJill Kelly / Tracy Quirk vs MARYBETH STUPKA / Crystal LoBue2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAngela Finch / Jamie Burgess vs Donna Embree / Kelly Finan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDeanna Amato / Allison Veillette vs Arlyn Kaufman / Sandy Reed6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 BR (40&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Angela Finch
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Jamie Burgess
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.54
Allison Veillette
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Terrel Thomas
published
2.52
Jill Kelly
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Lori Stafford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Summer Dejean
published
2.40
Tracy Quirk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Darcy Stafford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Melissa Harrell
published
1.92
Deanna Amato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Kelly + Melissa Harrell3647% games+13.7% vs expected
Jill Kelly + Jamie Burgess3349% games+6.5% vs expected
Allison Veillette + Deanna Amato2635% games+0.4% vs expected
Tracy Quirk + Jamie Burgess2448% games−0.9% vs expected
Lori Stafford + Tracy Quirk0631% games−8.8% vs expected
Lori Stafford + Melissa Harrell1830% games−9.8% vs expected
Darcy Stafford + Jamie Burgess0532% games−12.2% vs expected
Jill Kelly + Tracy Quirk2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Angela Finch
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Jamie Burgess
17W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Allison Veillette
10W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Terrel Thomas
21W–51L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
2.54
Jill Kelly
14W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lori Stafford
5W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.48
Summer Dejean
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.42
Tracy Quirk
11W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.40
2.5
Darcy Stafford
5W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Harrell
12W–41L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.17
2.5
Deanna Amato
4W–27L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.