Teams

BC-AltaVista/LindaLayton7.065

2026 Adult 65 & Over - Beach Cities · BC Women - 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 12 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
Sep 13 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
Sep 20 2:00 PM
West End Tennis & Health Club
Oct 4 2:00 PM
West End Tennis & Health Club
Oct 11 2:00 PM
Ernie Howlett Park
Oct 25 12:00 PM
Alta Vista Racquet Center
W#1 DoublesMary DeVlugt / Vicki Mingus vs Milagros Holub / Ingrid Pliska6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSherry Davidowitz / KC Jones vs Mina Jorgensen / Karin Chafetz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Layton / Kathleen Thurston vs Leslie Winston / Paulette Mashaka6-3, 6-1
W#1 DoublesVicki Mingus / Charmaine Nielsen vs Shizuko Takayasu / Rhonda Payson6-4, 4-5
L#2 DoublesAmy Dobson / Kathleen Thurston vs Marlina Goto / Deborah Hurwicz3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSherry Davidowitz / KC Jones vs Lynn Abelson / Leslie Winston6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · BC Women - 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian7.0000000
2BC-WestEnd/ColleenJohnson7.065000000
3BC-AltaVista/LindaLayton7.065000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Mary DeVlugt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.59
Charmaine Nielsen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Amy Dobson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Vicki Mingus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Kay Cotter
published 3
Elizabeth Frost
published
Gail Schirm
published
KC Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Thurston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Linda Layton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Davidowitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary DeVlugt
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Charmaine Nielsen
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Amy Dobson
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Vicki Mingus
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Kay Cotter
155W–94L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Schirm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
KC Jones
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Thurston
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Layton
3W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sherry Davidowitz
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.