Teams

Malley

2023 Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over Women · Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

3 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-07vs PongsugreeLost 02
L#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Joan Donoghue vs Linda Pongsugree / Michelle O'Brien6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Malley / Lori Huthoefer vs Tina Woods / Margaret Amy Flaherty3-6, 4-6
2023-02-28vs Acing GracefullySplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Tae Wills vs Donna Lee / Dana Kelly1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDebbie Kem / Joan Donoghue vs Jennifer Watts / Shirley McInturff6-3, 6-1
2023-02-21vs LeasWon 10
W#3 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Debbie Kem vs Katherine Ellsworth / Jennifer Yoon2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-14vs PongsugreeLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Connie Fowler vs Kimianne Lee / Lisa Wolff1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-02-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Chrisanne Finefrock / Donna Hopkins6-4, 6-2
2023-01-31vs LeasLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Driscoll / Lori Huthoefer vs Theresa Manion / Jennifer Yoon5-7, 5-5
2023-01-24vs PongsugreeLost 01
L#1 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Debbie Kem vs Paige Fishel / Mary Krueger0-6, 2-6
2023-01-17vs Acing GracefullySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Lori Huthoefer vs Dana Kelly / Donna Lee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCecile Boyle / Debbie Kem vs Jennifer Watts / Barbara Tobler4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-01-10vs LeasWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoan Donoghue / Debbie Kem vs Katherine Ellsworth / Ramona Batchelder6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLori Huthoefer / Susan Malley vs Kathy Morehouse / Theresa Manion6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Lori Huthoefer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Joan Donoghue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.12
Debbie Kem
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joan Donoghue + Debbie Kem1126955% games−2.5% vs expected
Lori Huthoefer + Debbie Kem8551% gamesnot enough data
Joan Donoghue + Lori Huthoefer6262% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Lori Huthoefer
264W–187L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Joan Donoghue
200W–125L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debbie Kem
233W–165L career · 7 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.