Teams

Sunpro-Blackhurst/Mayberry

2023 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.0W PM

20 players · average NTRP 4.05 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-05-30Won 10
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Elizabeth Vigil6-2, 6-2
2023-05-16Won 10
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Kristi Warren7-5, 7-5
2023-04-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesCambria Cook vs Bessy Nielson6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cambria Cook
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Lisa Mayberry
usually #2 Doubles 27%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Kim Santiago
usually #2 Singles 55%, also #1 Singles 36% · published 4
3.72
Tiffany Olson
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.67
Sherilyn Rawlings
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.63
Jill Ford
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Andrea Smith
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Lauren Rawlings
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.60
Michelle McGill
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
3.60
Tena Maughan
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.59
Kimberlie Bayne
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.54
Brenda Fowler
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Shelli Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.41
Halli Craft
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.38
Valerie Blackhurst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
Karen Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Kathleen Covey
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Pam Ollivier
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Smith + Karen Christensen6262% games+12.3% vs expected
Sherilyn Rawlings + Jill Ford5156% games+11.9% vs expected
Tiffany Olson + Brenda Fowler9357% games+10.1% vs expected
Tena Maughan + Andrea Smith3360% games+8.6% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kim Santiago10855% games+6.2% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Tiffany Olson3357% games+5.4% vs expected
Lisa Mayberry + Kim Santiago7164% games+5.0% vs expected
Andrea Smith + Shelli Johnston10752% games+4.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cambria Cook
32W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Belinda Jensen
147W–92L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.86
Lisa Mayberry
81W–78L career · 12 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Kim Santiago
154W–86L career · 11 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Tiffany Olson
116W–52L career · 9 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Sherilyn Rawlings
134W–64L career · 10 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
Jill Ford
85W–63L career · 8 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Andrea Smith
76W–48L career · 6 lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.62
Lauren Rawlings
44W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Michelle McGill
56W–55L career · 8 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Tena Maughan
87W–84L career · 7 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Kimberlie Bayne
96W–123L career · type A · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Brenda Fowler
88W–77L career · 7 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 9 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.52
Halli Craft
63W–46L career · 8 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
4
Valerie Blackhurst
71W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
3.38
Karen Christensen
41W–26L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Covey
16W–19L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Pam Ollivier
62W–72L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.