Teams

NJ ORANGE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-04-29vs NJ BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Brennan / Yukiko Brooks vs Miki Aylesworth / Caryn Moller6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Beth McCarty6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Amy Williams vs Kimberly Bonczynski / Kim Melvin6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-15vs RCC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Steputis / Sally Landmark vs Erin Kintzle / Debra Masters6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDori Webb vs Windy Cook6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Dalton / Jennifer Stiebeling vs Nancy Broumpton / Jeanne Peoples2-6, 3-6
2023-04-08vs BRMST REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Stiebeling / Yukiko Brooks vs Claudia Booton / Denise Belton6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Dalton / Sally Landmark vs Melissa McKenny / Yayoi Shaw1-6, 1-6
2023-04-01vs LTA-Q REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesDori Webb / Yukiko Brooks vs Hilary Hartwig / Catherine Romero6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAnne Steputis / Amy Williams vs Olimpia Mejia / Justine Barone1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.88 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.23
Mary Brennan
published
4.00
Anne Steputis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.96
Yukiko Brooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.93
Dori Webb
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Jennifer Stiebeling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.69
Lynn Dalton
published 4
3.68
Sally Landmark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yukiko Brooks + Dori Webb6162% games+11.2% vs expected
Sally Landmark + Anne Steputis281656% games+3.2% vs expected
Anne Steputis + Jennifer Stiebeling6354% games+0.8% vs expected
Yukiko Brooks + Jennifer Stiebeling8459% games−0.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Brennan
70W–21L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
4.23
4
Anne Steputis
115W–74L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
4.00
4
Yukiko Brooks
145W–118L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Dori Webb
123W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Jennifer Stiebeling
175W–107L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Lynn Dalton
34W–35L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Sally Landmark
45W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.