Teams

La.McRee18C

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-10-07vs Ke.Hurter18C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathan Griscik / Kristen Duke vs Amy Cantando / Meagan Moore6-2, 6-4
2024-10-02vs Cl.Duff18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Duke / AMY KOCH vs Margaret Eller / Kelly Jones0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Kathan Griscik vs Margaret Ann Kleisch / Laura Roach3-6, 5-7
2024-09-30vs St.Fogarty18C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Lanier McRee vs Amanda Brandon / Stephanie Fogarty6-3, 7-5
2024-09-23vs Ke.Blevins18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesLanier McRee / AMY KOCH vs Terri Bartucca / Kay Bonavita2-6, 3-6
2024-09-09vs De.Farmer18C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Duke / AMY KOCH vs LaTara Lewis / Taqiyya Yasin1-6, 3-6
2024-09-08vs Ke.Hurter18C2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Kristen Duke vs Amy Cantando / Angela McGee5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Evans / Lanier McRee vs Megan Oneill / Erica Mobley7-5, 6-1
2024-08-26vs St.Fogarty18C2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesLanier McRee / Kristen Duke vs Kim Manning / Miriam Waters7-6, 6-0
2024-08-19vs Ke.Blevins18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesKristen Duke / Lanier McRee vs Brandy Mann / Stephanie Williams7-6, 1-2
2024-08-12vs Cl.Duff18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesLanier McRee / Kristen Duke vs Ferebee Plyler / Sally Page6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesValerie Clowes / Nancy Walters vs Seely Nicholson / Margaret Ann Kleisch5-7, 2-6
2024-08-05vs De.Farmer18C2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesAMY KOCH / Kristen Duke vs LaTara Lewis / Kacey Barcliff6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLanier McRee / Nancy Walters vs Tiffany Scotton / Rhonda Blades6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Lanier McRee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
AMY KOCH
published 3
2.57
Kathan Griscik
published
2.55
Kristen Duke
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published 3
2.13
Valerie Clowes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristen Duke + Lanier McRee12756% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lanier McRee
120W–98L career · 12 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
AMY KOCH
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
2.84
Kathan Griscik
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%29%71%
2.57
3
Kristen Duke
115W–104L career · 11 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
2.55
2.5
Valerie Clowes
64W–134L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.