Teams

I.Navarro Galisteo

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesCaroline Beaird / Dana Aderhold vs June Boda / Megan Julich6-1, 6-1
2023-05-07vs D.Farmer3.0WWon 21
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Latoya Clay6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine George / Lee Anne Oxford vs Natasha Tyson / Dr Amy Linder5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCaroline Beaird vs MaryAdelaide Riddick2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-23vs K.Levine/WaychoffSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Catherine George vs Katie Warren / Monica Gardner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Melissa Cleary3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-16vs J.Brock 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesInma Navarro Galisteo / Lee Anne Oxford vs Heather Tuttle / Griffin Lamb4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine George / Caroline Beaird vs Jennifer Brock / Myra Peterson0-6, 0-6
2023-04-02vs B.LeippeWon 20
W#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Paige Alford6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Ann Pershke vs Jennifer Wolborsky / Christine Peterson7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2023-03-22vs K.Gilreath 18+Split 11
L#1 SinglesAnn Garey vs Katelyn Applegate2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLee Anne Oxford / Inma Navarro Galisteo vs Alisa Miller / Laurel Saunders6-4, 7-5
2023-03-19vs A.Cuni/M.LynchWon 21
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Barker / Lee Anne Oxford vs Chandra Cahoon / Casey House4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAnn Garey vs Beth Gildea4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine George / Caroline Beaird vs Brianna Shait / Kay Bonavita7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Lee Anne Oxford
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
2.84
Dana Aderhold
published 3
2.78
Catherine George
published 3
2.77
Ann Garey
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3
2.67
Ann Pershke
published 3
2.55
Caroline Beaird
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Kathleen Malik
published
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Inma Navarro Galisteo + Lee Anne Oxford5073% games+12.0% vs expected
Caroline Beaird + Lee Anne Oxford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Anne Oxford
83W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
3
Inma Navarro Galisteo
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Dana Aderhold
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Catherine George
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Ann Garey
94W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ann Pershke
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Caroline Beaird
46W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
2.55
Kathleen Malik
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
2.53
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.