Teams

Pe.Flack55A

2025 Capital Adult 55 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Douglas Currie vs James Kriete / Thomas Beck1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJohn Cruz / Chad Cox vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-28vs Ja.Copan55ALost 02
L#1 DoublesPaul Wilson / Stephen Mungenast vs Jeffrey Miller / Thomas Milici3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJay Gallagher / Mark Rosenberger vs Shawn Subasic / Jim Van Ness3-6, 3-6
2025-04-16vs Da.Rea55ALost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Zorko / John Cruz vs Mark Gentry / Charles King2-6, 0-6
2025-04-14vs Jo.Nance55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesMark Zorko / Stephen Mungenast vs James Reardon / Kurt Holmberg2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDouglas Currie / Chad Cox vs Ben Hund / Tom Pullara3-6, 0-6
2025-04-08vs Jo.Allessio55AWon 10
W#2 DoublesJay Gallagher / Mark Zorko vs John Allessio / Thomas Beck6-2, 6-1
2025-03-28vs Ja.Copan55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Jay Gallagher vs Peter Charland / Raul Louzao6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPeter Flack / Mark Zorko vs Thomas Milici / David Shuman1-6, 3-6
2025-03-10vs Jo.Nance55ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephen Mungenast / Jay Gallagher vs Mark Moye / Ayden Lee6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChad Cox / Elliott Blades vs Ben Hund / Tom Pullara1-6, 4-6
2025-03-05vs Da.Rea55ALost 03
L#1 DoublesDouglas Currie / Stephen Mungenast vs John Cleary / Mark Gentry3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMark Levy / Jay Gallagher vs Mike Spinak / Bruce Farrell3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesChad Cox / Paul Wilson vs Ed Stempien / Steven Harms2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Jay Gallagher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.77
Stephen Mungenast
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Mark Rosenberger
published
2.63
Peter Flack
published
2.62
Mark Zorko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.50
Chad Cox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.41
Elliott Blades
published 2.5
Mark Levy
published
Paul Wilson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jay Gallagher
78W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Stephen Mungenast
94W–132L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Mark Rosenberger
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Peter Flack
11W–27L career · no lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
2.63
3
Mark Zorko
36W–64L career · 4 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Chad Cox
31W–73L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Elliott Blades
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.41
Mark Levy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Wilson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.