Teams

WI Adult 18&O 2.5W GML ESL Pleasant Valley Kucharski

2023 WI Adult 18 & Over · WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 EarlyStartLeague GML Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.62 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesDeanna Weddig / Majka Drewitz vs Amy Pulokas / Sarah Augustson0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCaron Wold vs Julie Klein4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kucharski / MacKenzie Snow vs Amy Pulokas / Sarah Augustson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMajka Drewitz vs Tessa Papcke0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMICHELLE MESSLING / Caron Wold vs Julie Klein / Colleen MUTCHLER3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJennifer Fiste / Caron Wold vs Savannah Ferkins / Rebecca Greving1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMICHELLE MESSLING vs Tessa Papcke1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMajka Drewitz / Deanna Weddig vs Melissa Hoeft / Doreen Potter0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesHeidi Kucharski / Majka Drewitz vs Amy Pulokas / Savannah Ferkins0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesCaron Wold vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Fiste / MICHELLE MESSLING vs Doreen Potter / Colleen MUTCHLER5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesMacKenzie Snow / Jennifer Fiste vs Beth Ivey / Rebecca Greving1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMICHELLE MESSLING / Deanna Weddig vs Doreen Potter / Melissa Hoeft0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMICHELLE MESSLING / Jennifer Fiste vs Colleen MUTCHLER / Melissa Hoeft1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 18 & Over 2.5 EarlyStartLeague GML Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
MICHELLE MESSLING
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.38
Majka Drewitz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.32
Caron Wold
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.26
Deanna Weddig
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Heidi Kucharski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jennifer Fiste
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kate Carroll
published
MacKenzie Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MICHELLE MESSLING + Deanna Weddig123 matchesnot enough data
MacKenzie Snow + Heidi Kucharski123 matchesnot enough data
Majka Drewitz + Deanna Weddig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
MICHELLE MESSLING
62W–62L career · 8 lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
2.85
Majka Drewitz
7W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
2.38
2.5
Caron Wold
42W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%91%9%
2.32
2.5
Deanna Weddig
18W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Heidi Kucharski
1W–8L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Fiste
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Carroll
13W–35L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
MacKenzie Snow
28W–22L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.