Teams

SDurovic/FHaselden (Palisades)

2023 Combo Doubles 40 & Over League · 40 & Over 6.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-10-06vs KSchneider/IRapaglia (BCC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesFreida Haselden / Michelle Winterich vs Naomi O'Brien / Jami Stone6-3, 6-3
2023-09-29vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Mildred Hurd vs Mary Ruth Faulkner / Alison Ridenhour6-3, 6-1
2023-09-22vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Mildred Hurd vs Karen Claffey / Stacy Figgs Sokhi3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-01vs MEccleston/LBaddigam (Life Time)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Diane Smith vs Raquel Correa / Erin Clapham6-0, 7-6
2023-08-25vs AMilas (OPRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Mildred Hurd vs Anne Schmitt / Kathy Spence7-6, 7-6
2023-08-18vs KSchneider/IRapaglia (BCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Winterich / Mildred Hurd vs Michelle Lynch / Gaye Holmes6-4, 6-1
2023-08-11vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesMildred Hurd / Michelle Winterich vs Gina Arado / Amy Yancey6-4, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Elisa Salim
published 4
3.54
Laura Grant
published
3.47
Michelle Winterich
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.31
Kathy Gilchrist
published
3.28
Debbie Wilson
published 3.5
3.03
Stephanie Durovic
published
2.60
Joanne Ward
published
2.60
Mildred Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Freida Haselden
published 3
Michelle Borisenko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Freida Haselden + Joanne Ward123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elisa Salim
71W–28L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.78
Laura Grant
36W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Michelle Winterich
90W–40L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.47
Kathy Gilchrist
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.31
3.5
Debbie Wilson
8W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
Stephanie Durovic
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Joanne Ward
4W–19L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Mildred Hurd
47W–60L career · 5 lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Freida Haselden
3W–17L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.40
Michelle Borisenko
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.